Re: Java 1.6.0_19 & Hadoop

2010-07-21 Thread Allen Wittenauer
I seem to be ok with the little bit of _20 I've been using. On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:58 AM, Bill Au wrote: > Now that jdk 1.6.0_21 is out, has anyone been running it with Hadoop? We > have also had problem running Hadoop with 1.6.0_18. So what version of > 1.6.0 would people recommend for use wit

Re: Java 1.6.0_19 & Hadoop

2010-07-21 Thread Bill Au
Now that jdk 1.6.0_21 is out, has anyone been running it with Hadoop? We have also had problem running Hadoop with 1.6.0_18. So what version of 1.6.0 would people recommend for use with Hadoop? Bill On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> I was seeing

Re: Java 1.6.0_19 & Hadoop

2010-04-06 Thread Steve Loughran
Todd Lipcon wrote: I was seeing errors in 18 without escape analysis explicitly enabled. So unless it became enabled by default in 18, I don't think that was the issue. That's not good. The security fixes in this JVM do hint it's something to deploy sooner rather than later. http://isc.sans.

Re: Java 1.6.0_19 & Hadoop

2010-04-06 Thread Todd Lipcon
I was seeing errors in 18 without escape analysis explicitly enabled. So unless it became enabled by default in 18, I don't think that was the issue. -Todd On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > > I know everyone has had bad experiences w/ Java 1.6.0_18 and was sticking > with

Java 1.6.0_19 & Hadoop

2010-04-06 Thread Steve Loughran
I know everyone has had bad experiences w/ Java 1.6.0_18 and was sticking with JVM releases they trusted, but the set of security patches that have come out with the _19 release change the situation. There are enough server-side vulnerabilities there to make upgrading something to consider if