Change from Private to Contract might not be an issue. Change from Public
to Contract might be incompatible behavior irrespective of whether
InterfaceAudience is evolving or stable.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
> It may work fine from a code perspective, bu
It may work fine from a code perspective, but from a semantic and/or
human perspective, I think it’d be confusing and could lead to problems down
the road. Let’s say we add Contract after making this Stable. If we change
any Private’s to Contracts as a result, is that a break?
On
Agreed. Any one interested in reviewing/committing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11476?
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Chris Nauroth
wrote:
> Would it really be backwards-incompatible if we added new levels later?
> That seems counter-intuitive and contrary to this piece of doc
Would it really be backwards-incompatible if we added new levels later?
That seems counter-intuitive and contrary to this piece of documentation:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-13.html#jls-13.5.7
Quoting:
Annotation types behave exactly like any other interface. Adding or
r
IIRC, it was marked as evolving because it wasn’t clear at the time
whether we would need to add more stability levels. (One of the key
inspirations for the stability levels—Sun’s ARC process—had more.)
So I think it’s important to remember that if this gets changed to
stable,
Patch attached. I'm not sure what is necessary for changing the stability
of class. Please review.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> Thanks for your thoughts guys. I've created
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11476 to follow through on
> this.
>
> On Tue,
Thanks for your thoughts guys. I've created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11476 to follow through on
this.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Robert Kanter
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Though it is kinda funny that the
+1
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Robert Kanter wrote:
> +1
>
> Though it is kinda funny that the InterfaceStability annotation was marked
> as Evolving :)
> @InterfaceStability.Evolving
> public class InterfaceStability {...}
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
+1
Though it is kinda funny that the InterfaceStability annotation was marked
as Evolving :)
@InterfaceStability.Evolving
public class InterfaceStability {...}
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Abraham Elmahrek
> wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
>
+1
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Abraham Elmahrek wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've noticed the InterfaceStability (
>
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/InterfaceStability.java
> )
> and InterfaceAud
Hey guys,
I've noticed the InterfaceStability (
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-annotations/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/classification/InterfaceStability.java)
and InterfaceAudience (
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-common-project/had
11 matches
Mail list logo
