Dhruba's off in a different timezone. So he might not be able to. I'll ask
though.
Nate, I, and Nemanja will be working on this. We're really hoping the patch
will be living for just a few weeks or a month at most.
Hopefully a good deal of the code we write will be testable so that will
result in
+1 for a branch; ideally not too long lived. Dhruba still has commit rights,
perhaps he could be persuaded to help with it.
If you look at the Hadoop code, it's not just network assumptions, it's fairly
brittle to bad network setup -and not helpful when these situations arise. What
could be go
+1
I don't suppose you could be conned into fixing multi-NIC and other
networking issues also? ;)
Do you have a list of contributors who plan to work on this feature? -C
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Elliott Clark wrote:
> Nate (nkedel) and I have been working on IPv6 on Hadoop and HBase lat
+1, would be great to see Hadoop get ipv6 support.
Colin
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Elliott Clark wrote:
> Nate (nkedel) and I have been working on IPv6 on Hadoop and HBase lately.
> We're getting somewhere but there are a lot of different places that make
> assumptions about network. That
Absolutely.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Elliott Clark wrote:
> Nate (nkedel) and I have been working on IPv6 on Hadoop and HBase lately.
> We're getting somewhere but there are a lot of different places that make
> assumptions about network. That means there will be a good deal of follow
>
Nate (nkedel) and I have been working on IPv6 on Hadoop and HBase lately.
We're getting somewhere but there are a lot of different places that make
assumptions about network. That means there will be a good deal of follow
on patches as we find more and more places that need some TLC.
Would a featu
