site? let me check that, I may have missed that in my second attempt, oops!
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The build would fail in the "site" phase for me for some reason because of
> a missing dependency management section. Adding dev-support as parent to
> the new modu
The build would fail in the "site" phase for me for some reason because of
a missing dependency management section. Adding dev-support as parent to
the new module fixed that.
On Thursday, October 18, 2012, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hmm. It did build for me (in the sense of completing successfully, e
I have reverted the patch in branch-2. Colin we may need a separate
branch-2 patch instead of merging the patch.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> I meant revert the patch and merge the right patch :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Suresh Srinivas
> wrote:
>
>> L
I meant revert the patch and merge the right patch :-)
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> Lets revert the job and merge the right patch.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
>
>> Hmm. It did build for me (in the sense of completing successfully, etc).
Lets revert the job and merge the right patch.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hmm. It did build for me (in the sense of completing successfully, etc).
>
> You've definitely found an issue, though. The version should be
> 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT for those projects, not 3.0.0-SNAPS
Hmm. It did build for me (in the sense of completing successfully, etc).
You've definitely found an issue, though. The version should be
2.0.3-SNAPSHOT for those projects, not 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
Do you want to file a JIRA and post this patch, or should I?
cheers.
Colin
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6
Sorry, I always forget that about the mailing list software.
>From a6efe4883f3f7694ec6e8da04de982fb21eed8a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Purtell
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:22:17 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix incorrect versions and missing module parent introduced
by HADOOP-8887
---
dev-su
Hi Andrew,
It seems that your attachment did not appear on the mailing list.
I'm taking a look at the branch-2 build presently.
Colin
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> The port of HADOOP-8887 to branch-2 fails the build. Please kindly see
> attached.
>
> --
> Best regar
The port of HADOOP-8887 to branch-2 fails the build. Please kindly see
attached.
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
