Thanks Steve!
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:40 PM Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> mukund is planning a new release soon, one with updated dependencies and
> things. I will validate the checksums
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 16:24, Lars Francke wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the quick response.
>> No worries at all,
mukund is planning a new release soon, one with updated dependencies and
things. I will validate the checksums
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 16:24, Lars Francke wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response.
> No worries at all, it just made our scripts fail on the checksum.
>
> So, yeah. It'd be great if - in
Thanks for the quick response.
No worries at all, it just made our scripts fail on the checksum.
So, yeah. It'd be great if - in the future - the "correct" checksum
files were to be used instead.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 4:48 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
>
> Hi that's a good catch
> The RC1 was used
Hi that's a good catch
The RC1 was used for official release, and instead of using the build
script to create an entirely new release tarball I simply updated the file
names.
Probably shouldn't do so.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 6:00 AM Lars Francke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the checksum file for the 3.3.6 re
Hi,
the checksum file for the 3.3.6 release references the 3.3.6-rc1 file
which makes it harder to compare.
https://archive.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-3.3.6/hadoop-3.3.6.tar.gz.sha512
contains
SHA512 (hadoop-3.3.6-RC1.tar.gz) =
de3eaca2e0517e4b569a88b63c89fae19cb8ac6c01ff990f1ff8f0cc0
