+1 (binding)
Thanks Matt.
Arun
On May 21, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to
> remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"s in that thread.
> Absent objection I will count those as votes without requir
+1 (non-binding)
Best Regards
Ahmed
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to
> remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"s in that thread.
> Absent objection I will count those as votes witho
+1
Jason
On 05/21/2013 09:03 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to
remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"s in that thread.
Absent objection I will count those as votes without requiring them to
(re-)respond to thi
+1 Thanks Matt.
Tom
On 5/21/13 9:03 PM, "Matt Foley" wrote:
>This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws
>to
>remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"s in that
>thread.
> Absent objection I will count those as votes without requiring them to
>(re-)
Forgot to say: Vote will close one week after it started, at 7:05pm PDT on
Tuesday 28 May.
Thanks,
--Matt
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws
> to remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"
Tx for taking care of this, Matt. It had to be done.
+1
Thanks,
+Vinod
On May 21, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to
> remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"s in that thread.
> Absent objection I
+1.
-- Hitesh
On May 21, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to
> remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"s in that thread.
> Absent objection I will count those as votes without requiring them to
> (r
This was previously discussed in the thread "[PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to
remove Release Plan vote". 13 people explicitly cast "+1"s in that thread.
Absent objection I will count those as votes without requiring them to
(re-)respond to this VOTE thread.
The following change is proposed in the
