With I believe 9 +1s (7 binding), the vote passes. Thanks all for voting
and the very helpful discussion, I'll file a JIRA and get this content in a
more accessible place.
Best,
Andrew
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks,
> Sangjin
>
> On Tue, Aug
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Sangjin
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Ravi Prakash wrote:
> +1. Thanks
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 24, 2015 3:02 PM, Jing Zhao
> wrote:
>
>
> +1. Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding. Thanks Andrew!
> >
> > ---
>
+1. Thanks
On Monday, August 24, 2015 3:02 PM, Jing Zhao wrote:
+1. Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote:
> +1 non-binding. Thanks Andrew!
>
> ---
> Zhe Zhang
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Karthik Kambatla
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for driving t
+1. Thanks.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote:
> +1 non-binding. Thanks Andrew!
>
> ---
> Zhe Zhang
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Karthik Kambatla
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for driving this, Andrew.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Vinayakumar B >
> > wrot
+1 non-binding. Thanks Andrew!
---
Zhe Zhang
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for driving this, Andrew.
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Vinayakumar B
> wrote:
>
> > +1,
> >
> > -Vinay
> > On Aug 24, 2015 11:29 PM, "Colin P. McCabe" wrote:
> >
> >
+1
Thanks for driving this, Andrew.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Vinayakumar B
wrote:
> +1,
>
> -Vinay
> On Aug 24, 2015 11:29 PM, "Colin P. McCabe" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > cheers,
> > Colin
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Steve Loughran >
> > wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
>
+1,
-Vinay
On Aug 24, 2015 11:29 PM, "Colin P. McCabe" wrote:
> +1
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Steve Loughran
> wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:44, Andrew Wang wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi common-dev,
> >>
> >> As promised, here is an official vote t
+1
cheers,
Colin
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:44, Andrew Wang wrote:
>>
>> Hi common-dev,
>>
>> As promised, here is an official vote thread. Let's run it for the standard
>> 7 days, closing on Aug 28th at noon. Only PMC membe
+1 (binding)
> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:44, Andrew Wang wrote:
>
> Hi common-dev,
>
> As promised, here is an official vote thread. Let's run it for the standard
> 7 days, closing on Aug 28th at noon. Only PMC members have binding votes,
> but of course everyone's input is welcomed.
>
> If the vo
Understood, and agreed on the need to preserve the commit history. The only
reason I thought I'd comment is that the current proposal explicitly
mentions "git merge --no-ff" when merging the branch to trunk. "--squash"
cannot be combined with "--no-ff", thus I wanted some clarification.
On Fri, Au
>
> I know this is a different topic than the main reason for this vote, but
> has there been a discussion of using a squashed merge as opposed to a
> normal merge when feature branches merge to trunk? Squash merges have some
> advantages including complicating the branch tree.
>
Since this [VOTE]
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Andrew Wang
wrote:
> Hi common-dev,
>
> As promised, here is an official vote thread. Let's run it for the standard
> 7 days, closing on Aug 28th at noon. Only PMC members have binding votes,
> but of course everyone's input is welcomed.
>
> If the vote passes, I'
Hi common-dev,
As promised, here is an official vote thread. Let's run it for the standard
7 days, closing on Aug 28th at noon. Only PMC members have binding votes,
but of course everyone's input is welcomed.
If the vote passes, I'll put the text on the website somewhere as
recommended by Steve.
13 matches
Mail list logo
