Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-16 Thread Andrew Purtell
eir worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White) - Original Message - > From: Stack > To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 9:56 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2 > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:32 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-16 Thread Stack
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Matt Foley wrote: > Dear all, > I have a clean build of the below, that passes junit testing, and was about > to post it, when I got email about the newly opened > HADOOP-7929 "Port > HADOOP-7070 to branch-1".  It

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-16 Thread Matt Foley
Dear all, I have a clean build of the below, that passes junit testing, and was about to post it, when I got email about the newly opened HADOOP-7929 "Port HADOOP-7070 to branch-1". It appears this prevents secure HBase from working with secure Ha

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-14 Thread Mark Holderbaugh
Matt, I would like to request the following JIRA be included in Hadoop 1.0.0. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-3475 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2589 Thanks Mark On 12/8/11 1:57 PM, "Matt Foley" wrote: > Hello all, > I have posted a release candidate for Hado

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-14 Thread Marco Zühlke
Chris K Wensel writes: > > fwiw, looks like there is a dependency missing for jackson in the published pom file. Hi Chris, there is already an issues for this: HADOOP-7461 Marco > > Looks like JobClient imports some of its classes causing Hadoop local mode to fail if running directly from >

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-13 Thread Matt Foley
In various emails and jiras, I have been asked to incorporate the following additional patches in 1.0.0: - MAPREDUCE-3319 (Roman) - HADOOP-7903 (Arpit) - MAPREDUCE-3475 (Daryn) - HDFS-2589 (Daryn) - HADOOP jira about to be opened (Chris W.) for missing jackson dependency in hadoo

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-13 Thread Chris K Wensel
fwiw, looks like there is a dependency missing for jackson in the published pom file. Looks like JobClient imports some of its classes causing Hadoop local mode to fail if running directly from a mvn retrieve etc.. There seems to be a fair number of Cascading/Hadoop sub-projects that do this a

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-12 Thread Matt Foley
Yes, I agree that we, the whole Hadoop development community, need to help each other get the various components working together, and keep them mutually compatible as each continues to grow and evolve. I think BigTop is providing a valuable service in this area, by providing an official Apache pl

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-12 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Matt Foley wrote: >>> Btw, I think it is very instructive to take a look at how > Linux community has dealt >>> with version transition between 2.X -> 3.X. > > You mean you want us to not call it 1.0.0?  As I remember the vote was > overwhelmingly > in favor of ca

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-10 Thread Matt Foley
>> Btw, I think it is very instructive to take a look at how Linux community has dealt >> with version transition between 2.X -> 3.X. You mean you want us to not call it 1.0.0? As I remember the vote was overwhelmingly in favor of calling it 1.0.0. --Matt On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Roman

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-10 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote: > Hey Roman, > > That problem is at Hive end. You can try out the patch at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2631 to unblock your testing. Btw, I think it is very instructive to take a look at how Linux community has dealt with ve

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Matt Foley wrote: > Hello all, > I have posted a release candidate for Hadoop 1.0.0 at >    http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.0.0-rc2/ > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list. > The artifacts will be posted to the maven repo shortly. > The vote

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote: > Hey Roman, > > That problem is at Hive end. You can try out the patch at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2631 to unblock your testing. Sure. As I said -- the fix is pretty simple. However, releasing this would break every sing

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Ashutosh Chauhan
Hey Roman, That problem is at Hive end. You can try out the patch at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2631 to unblock your testing. Thanks, Ashutosh On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 18:21, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > +Carl (the only person from Hive project I know ;-)) > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
+Carl (the only person from Hive project I know ;-)) On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Matt Foley wrote: > Hello all, > I have posted a release candidate for Hadoop 1.0.0 at >    http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.0.0-rc2/ Ok, my test run is now past HBase (horray! that works). That's the

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Roman, the 1.0.0-rc2 is built from branch-1.0@1211738, which contains > c1207581. Thanks. This is useful to know. Wish I had that info earlier :-( > Is the problem consistently reproducible in 1.0.0-rc2?  Perhaps you're > seeing  some intermitt

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Matt Foley
Roman, the 1.0.0-rc2 is built from branch-1.0@1211738, which contains c1207581. Is the problem consistently reproducible in 1.0.0-rc2? Perhaps you're seeing some intermittent behavior? On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Matt Foley wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Hi Roman, > regarding MAPREDUCE-3319 I'm confused too.  Your comment in the bug as > of 28/Nov/11 21:49 seems to indicate that it is fixed, but clearly it wasn't > fixed the same way as Subroto's patch (which came in on Dec 6). What is the tag c

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Matt Foley
Hi Roman, regarding MAPREDUCE-3319 I'm confused too. Your comment in the bug as of 28/Nov/11 21:49 seems to indicate that it is fixed, but clearly it wasn't fixed the same way as Subroto's patch (which came in on Dec 6). Anyway, I reviewed and

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-09 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Matt Foley wrote: > Hello all, > I have posted a release candidate for Hadoop 1.0.0 at >    http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.0.0-rc2/ > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list. Pulled into Bigtop, built and running integrations tests today. Qui

[VOTE] Hadoop-1.0.0 release candidate 2

2011-12-08 Thread Matt Foley
Hello all, I have posted a release candidate for Hadoop 1.0.0 at http://people.apache.org/~mattf/hadoop-1.0.0-rc2/ Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list. The artifacts will be posted to the maven repo shortly. The vote will close at noon PST on Thursday 15 Dec. It may be of interes