Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

Hey Wei-Chiu, Thanks for sharing your plans on Hadoop 3. Good to know. 1. So I understand people don't care about Hadoop 3.0 any more. I see we don't even list this line on the Releases page: https://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html I think it is fair to EOL 3.0 and stop making changes to it. 2.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

Erik, I've just got this message now. Something funky is going on with my workplace mailbox. With my Apache's hat on, I find it too costly to maintain a 3.0.x release line: my personal time to try to backport commits, resolving conflicts. Additionally, we would be forced to make additional 3.0.x r

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

I'd like to revive this discussion. Today I see committers variously skipping backports to branch-3.0 and/or branch-3.1 (when backporting to branch-2, for example) and I'm concerned that we will have divergence between what commits are present in which branches. Wei-Chiu, is Cloudera still rebasin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

2019 11:55 PM To: Hadoop Common Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL Thank you for your feedback, > IMHO, I'd love to see HDFS-13596 > <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FHDFS-1359

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

Thank you for your feedback, > IMHO, I'd love to see HDFS-13596 > fixed to make it possible > to rolling upgrade from Hadoop 2 to Hadoop 3.0 If HDFS-13596 is fixed in branch-3.1/3.2, will it be possible to rolling upgrade from Hadoop 2 to Hadoo

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

+1 for keeping no of active branches low, specially when it is not used actively. On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:33 AM Steve Loughran wrote: > I've been intermittently backporting things to it, but like you say: not > getting much active use. > > >1. I'd like to view the 3.1 branch as the main "r

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

I've been intermittently backporting things to it, but like you say: not getting much active use. 1. I'd like to view the 3.1 branch as the main "ready to play with" Hadoop 3.x release, with 3.2 some new features. 2. I'm planning on backporting some of the hadoop 3.x ABFS and S3A work

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

Thanks for initiating the discussion, Akira. I've given similar thoughts on the possible EOL of Hadoop branch-3.0 line. IMHO, I'd love to see HDFS-13596 fixed to make it possible to rolling upgrade from Hadoop 2 to Hadoop 3.0, and then roll anothe

[DISCUSS] Release 3.0.4 or branch-3.0 EOL

Hi folks, In branch-3.0, it is almost a year since 3.0.3 was released. Is there any committer who wants to be a release manager of 3.0.4? If there are no users running Apache Hadoop 3.0.x in production, I'm thinking we can stop maintaining branch-3.0. Please let me know there are any users runnin