Thanks all for your reply!
Based on discussion here, I merged HADOOP-9613 to
trunk after the reviews. Thank you for the great helps. The problems
reported on HADOOP-9613 by Wangda, Li, and Sunil is filed as
YARN-5275. I'll also take a look at it.
I believe this change is a great step for compilin
+1. Awesome effort Tsuyoshi. This has been blocking compression on the wire
too.
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 for updating this in trunk. Thanks, Tsuyoshi Ozawa.
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
> > Hi developers,
> >
> >
+1 for updating this in trunk. Thanks, Tsuyoshi Ozawa.
cheers,
Colin
On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's
> essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there.
>
> One concer
+1 agreed.
> On May 9, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Akira AJISAKA wrote:
>
> +1 for marking HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change and upgrading the version
> in trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
> On 5/9/16 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
>> Hi developers,
>>
>> We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for
+1 for marking HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change and upgrading the
version in trunk.
Thanks,
Akira
On 5/9/16 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
Hi developers,
We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's
essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there.
One
Hi developers,
We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's
essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there.
One concern to merge this to trunk is incompatibility. After the
release of Jersey 1.13, the root element whose content is empty
collection is chan