Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-06-06 Thread Steve Loughran
think it's unrelated ... hadoop-* hasn't moved to the role-based model yet AFAIK On 6 June 2014 00:03, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Just notice this email. So do you know if the unable to assign issues > for contributors a side effect result or intended behavior? > > - Henry > > On Fri,

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-06-05 Thread Henry Saputra
Hi Steve, Just notice this email. So do you know if the unable to assign issues for contributors a side effect result or intended behavior? - Henry On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > ASF JIRA has been moving to role-based over group-based security -you may > be able to giv

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-05-16 Thread Ravi Prakash
You mean {common,mapreduce,yarn,hdfs}-{dev,commits,issues}@hadoop.apache.org lists mentioned on https://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html ? On Friday, May 16, 2014 4:44 PM, Pete of Pete wrote: On behalf of those of us who keep an eye on posts for commercial reasons (but do not contribute

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-05-16 Thread Pete of Pete
Cheers Aaron! All the best, ;-pete On 16 May 2014 19:47, "Aaron T. Myers" wrote: > Hey Pete, > > The "contributor list" we're referring to is just the collection of folks > in JIRA that JIRAs can be assigned to. It doesn't impact anyone's ability > to follow JIRAs, just have new JIRAs assigned

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-05-16 Thread Aaron T. Myers
Hey Pete, The "contributor list" we're referring to is just the collection of folks in JIRA that JIRAs can be assigned to. It doesn't impact anyone's ability to follow JIRAs, just have new JIRAs assigned to them. It also doesn't do anything to JIRAs that are already assigned. -- Aaron T. Myers So

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-05-16 Thread Kihwal Lee
I removed a bunch who have been inactive for years a couple of months ago from hdfs. Having a limit forces us to remove stale entries, so it is not entirely bad. If the actual number of contributors reach the limit and the limit can't be changed easily, we might be able to create another jira gro

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-05-16 Thread Pete of Pete
On behalf of those of us who keep an eye on posts for commercial reasons (but do not contribute) Is there the option of setting up a list that accesses the dev comms, but doesn't impact the contributor list? P On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Last time we cleaned up nam

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-05-16 Thread Steve Loughran
ASF JIRA has been moving to role-based over group-based security -you may be able to give more people a role than a group allows. But, as of last week and a spark-initiated change, by default contributors can't assign issues. someone could talk to infra@apache and see if a move would help On 14

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

2014-05-15 Thread Suresh Srinivas
Last time we cleaned up names of people who had not contributed in a long time. That could be an option. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > Hi devs > > Looks like we ran over the max contributors allowed for a project, again. I > don't remember what we did last time and

#Contributors on JIRA

2014-05-12 Thread Karthik Kambatla
Hi devs Looks like we ran over the max contributors allowed for a project, again. I don't remember what we did last time and can't find it in my email either. Can we bump up the number of contributors allowed? Otherwise, we might have to remove some of the currently inactive contributors from the