On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:29AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
> That’s really a question for infrastructure-...@apache.org . They
> manage the ASF build infrastructure which Apache Hadoop and lots of
> other projects utilize. (Bigtop uses something custom, which I think
> is fun
ing the same.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> > On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:54 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> >
> > well, I'm not going to block it...it doesn't add anything more to the pom
> > dependencies that aren't there right now
> >
> >>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:45AM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> I think Karthik correctly identified the two reasons we might want to
> denote a release as "unstable":
>
> a) Compatibility. Whether we have freedom to break compatibility before the
> final release, i.e. what "alpha" typically means.
Breakin
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:51PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> > On 25 Nov 2015, at 02:48, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> >
> > Vinod, hopefully it isn't too late for a quick fix to be included into 2.7.2
> > (sorry for jumping too late on this train). The JIRA in qu
Vinod, hopefully it isn't too late for a quick fix to be included into 2.7.2
(sorry for jumping too late on this train). The JIRA in question is
HADOOP-12415 and I have committed it to trunk and branch-2 already.
Please let me know if this is still Ok to add into 2.7.2 as it seems to be
going thro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-7730.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Release Note: The resolution has been do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-7481.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Release Note: Ain't gonna happen clearly:
Konstantin Boudnik created HADOOP-12415:
---
Summary: Hadoop build is broken because of missed compile-time
dependency
Key: HADOOP-12415
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12415
Konstantin Boudnik created HADOOP-11945:
---
Summary: Add Apache Ignite (incubating) to the "Hadoop-related
projects"
Key: HADOOP-11945
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HA
While it sounds like a topic for a different discussion (or list@), do you
think it would be too crazy to skip JDK7 completely and just go to JDK8
directly? I think downstream components like HBase, Spark and so on would be a
huge driving factor to make the same change in Hadoop and other parts of
If we use maven jar plugin or maven archivers to create any of these then
adding
false
should solve the issue.
Cos
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 01:55PM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> I dug around a bit with Tucu, and I think it's essentially the dependency
> analyzer screwing up with snapshot artifacts. I
1-919
=
BTW, we have one or two spots left, so if you didn't make your reservation -
now is the time.
See you all tomorrow.
Cos
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 04:33PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> One more update: it seema that for ppl in SF, who oftentimes might not even
ctly to me if you're interested before end of Sunday, 13th.
Cheers,
Cos
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:23PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> All,
>
> Re-sending this announcement in case it fell through over the long weekend
> when people were away. We still have seats left, so register
All,
Re-sending this announcement in case it fell through over the long weekend
when people were away. We still have seats left, so register soon.
Regards,
Cos
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 06:37PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> We'd like to invite you to the
> Consensus based rep
2014 at 08:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Guys,
>
> In the last a couple of weeks, we had a very good and productive initial round
> of discussions on the JIRAs. I think it is worthy to keep the momentum going
> and have a more detailed conversation. For that, we'd like to host s Had
They are actually listed in the first email on this thread. Here they are:
HADOOP-10641
HDFS-6469
Cos
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:30PM, Sujeet Varakhedi wrote:
> Can you point me to the JIRA's
>
> Sujeet
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Konstantin Boud
Guys,
In the last a couple of weeks, we had a very good and productive initial round
of discussions on the JIRAs. I think it is worthy to keep the momentum going
and have a more detailed conversation. For that, we'd like to host s Hadoop
developers meetup to get into the bowls of the consensus-bas
Do you guys think that committing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4858
to branch-2.3 is still Ok? It is a small change that bring fixes broken
timeout behavior of DN to NN RPC.
We have been testing this fix on top of 2.0.6 for a long time now and it seems
to be a real help.
Apprec
hanks INFRA guys for quick response!
Cos
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 08:57PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Guys,
>
> anyone experience any issues with committing to Hadoop SVN today? Looks like
> my password is getting rejected by the SVN server (same password works for
> login in
Guys,
anyone experience any issues with committing to Hadoop SVN today? Looks like
my password is getting rejected by the SVN server (same password works for
login into people.apache.org).
Want to make before troubling INFRA. Thanks in advance!
--
Take care,
Cos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik reopened HADOOP-10110:
-
Needed to be ported back into 2.0.x line as it's breaking the build there as
Can anyone with admin rights in YARN JIRA project release 2.0.6-alpha version?
Thanks,
Cos
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:44AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> All,
>
> I have pushed the bits of 2.0.6-alpha into the open and released staging bits
> in Nexus. Site is updated with the
All,
I have pushed the bits of 2.0.6-alpha into the open and released staging bits
in Nexus. Site is updated with the release news.
2.0.6-alpha is officially live now. Thanks everybody for your help!
Cos
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:09PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I am clearly +1 (
I am clearly +1 (non-binding) on the release.
With 8 +1s (5 binding), no -1s or 0s the vote passes.
Thanks to all who verified the bits, I'll push them out shortly.
Thanks,
Cos
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:29PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candi
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.6-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
as outlined on the security list.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.6-alpha-rc1/
The RC t
:check passes on the RC before publishing
> it.
>
> Arun, as you are about to cut the new RC for 2.1.0-beta, can you please
> make sure the license headers are used in the releasenotes HTML files?
>
> Thx
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Konstantin
the NO OK points (specially the last one), they
> are trivial.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.6-alpha that I
> > would
> &
don't have license
> headers,
>
> I think we need to address the NO OK points (specially the last one), they
> are trivial.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have created
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.6-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
as outlined on the security list.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.6-alpha-rc0/
The RC t
Same here.
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:54PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> We need clarification on this then.
>
> I was under the impression that branch-2 would be 2.2.0.
>
> thx
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jason Lowe wrote:
>
> > I thought Arun intends for 2.2.0 to be created off of br
I am clearly +1 (non-binding) on the release.
With 8 +1s (3 binding), no -1s or 0s the vote passes.
Thanks to all who verified the bits, I'll push them out shortly.
Thanks,
Cos
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:51PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I have rolled out release candidate (rc2) fo
signatures, built, ran
> single node cluster.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>
>
> On 6/3/13 2:51 PM, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote:
>
> >I have rolled out release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha.
> >
> >The difference between rc1 and rc2 is th
te before 06/06/2013 5pm PDT.
Thanks for your patience!
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 09:27PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> All,
>
> I have created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
> like to release.
>
> This is a stabilization release that i
Ok, if this the consensus on the issue, then tonight I will cut rc2 with only
CHANGES.txt release dates update. After that I will extend the vote once
again.
Sorry for the hassle to all who did voted before.
Cos
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:18AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 9:01
out it I will alter the CHANGES.txt
files
thanks,
Cos
> Arun
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:04PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> >> I record the 'release date' as the one on which the build is crea
hes, ie branch-2 and trunk. Am I correct?
Thanks,
Cos
> hth,
> Arun
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > This is my first Hadoop release, so I am all ears ;) I looked at how Arun
> > was
> > cutting the previous 2.0.x and followed
asy way to solve it it would be
> using as release date the date the vote ends. Anyway, not a big deal if we
> are not cutting a new rc for other reason
>
> +1 on rc1
>
> Thx
>
> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > Alejandro,
> &
ttp://people.apache.org/~cos/hadoop-2.0.5-alpha-rc1/
> > looks good to me.
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joep
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, WRT HDFS-
I changes are completed, I have updated branch-2 and trunk CHANGES.txt files
as planned. Version of the branch-2 is set to 2.1.0-beta; 2.0.5-alpha release
artifacts are deployed to the staging area.
Thanks for your patience, guys!
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote
Chris,
with 2.0.5-alpha (rc1) out, would you please take a look at the release bits?
I assume the four-digit numbering scheme issue has been resolved now.
Regards,
Cos
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:18PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
&g
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/had
that you guys have noted
earlier and will be re-spinning RC1 in a few.
Cos
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:07PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Alejandro,
>
> thanks for looking into this. Indeed - I missed the 2.0.5-alpha section in
> YARN CHANGES.txt. Added now. As for HDFS-4646: appare
oes not have the 2.0.5-alpha section (it should
> be there empty).
>
> Cos, can you please look at these 2 things and explain/fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I have create
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.5-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/had
, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I will be performing some changes wrt to moving 2.0.4.1 release candidate
> > to
> > 2.0.5 space. As outline below by Alejandro:
> >
> > 1. I will create new 2.0.5-alpha branch from the current
Guys,
I will be performing some changes wrt to moving 2.0.4.1 release candidate to
2.0.5 space. As outline below by Alejandro:
1. I will create new 2.0.5-alpha branch from the current head of 2.0.4-alpha
that contains 2.0.4.1 changes
2. consequently, set the artifacts version on the new branch to
o 2.0.5-alpha versions
> in jira for HADOOP, HDFS, YARN & MAPREDUCE.
>
> Please take care of the rest.
>
> Also, in branch-2, the version should be 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 20
urrent 2.0.5 version in JIRA to 2.1.0, create a new 2.0.5
> version, change the fix version of the 2 JIRAs that make the RC
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
> > wr
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 05:30PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > There's no plans to release anything else at this point - this is a bug-fix
> > release, as I pointed out on a numerous occasions. There's no new fe
tml
>
> 0.17.2 was missing some native libs so 0.17.2.1 was released to fix
> that critical issue instead of calling it .3
Exactly the point - the _bigfix_ release. Thanks for pointing out the
similarities.
Cos
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
that's standard
> usage. Whoever makes the 2.0.5 release (or any "next" release) is expected
> to update the parent branch's SNAPSHOT default versioning, per
> HowToReleasePostMavenization#Branching<https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePostMavenization#Branching&
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:18PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > There's no misunderstanding Chris - this release is to unblock downstream.
> >
> > As for your question: I don't have a crystal ball; I wish thou
Someone with proper karma needs to add you into ACL for this page.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:14PM, Adam Kawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When uploading new content (and information about my company), I got the
> exception
> "Sorry, can not save page because "rubbelloselotto.de" is not allowed in
> this wik
is the first time we are seeing a four-numbered scheme in
> > Hadoop. Why not call this 2.0.5-alpha?
>
> Good point. Since it contains only backports from branch-2, it would
> make sense for it to be an intermediate release.
>
> I shouldn't have to say this, but I&
re very confusing. Some of them never been concluded, the
branches are moved and artifact versions seem to be colliding. 2.0.4.x seems
to work well for the stabilization purposes and it will allow to unblock
downstream and integration projects quickly.
Cos
> Arun
>
> On May 24, 2013, at 8:48 P
All,
I have created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.0.4.1-alpha that I would
like to release.
This is a stabilization release that includes fixed for a couple a of issues
discovered in the testing with BigTop 0.6.0 release candidate.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~cos/h
Forwarded message --
> From: Konstantin Boudnik
> Date: Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Bugfix release 2.0.4.1
> To:═common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>
>
> The build is over, all unit tests have passed.
> Roman, the 2.0.4.1 tarballs are available from
> https://
The build is over, all unit tests have passed.
Roman, the 2.0.4.1 tarballs are available from
https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-branch-2.0.4/47/
For Bigtop to use as the base.
Cos
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:15PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> I have ran the full set of unit tests on
I have ran the full set of unit tests on the patched version and I see 3
failures in HDFS HA stress tests, which are clearly not related to fix in
question. I will commit it shortly.
Cos
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:03AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavil
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:52PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote:
> > Assuming that you are talking about HDFS features when you say
>
> > > "features going into a beta on a very short short timetable" and
> > > "laundry list" etc,
> > >
> >
> > No, that would not be a correct assumption.
> >
> > So these f
Guys,
I guess what you're missing is that Bigtop isn't a testing framework for
Hadoop. It is stack framework that verifies that components are dealing with
each other nicely. Every single stack is different: Bigtop 0.5.0 differs from
0.6.0, and so on. Bigtop - as any other ASF project - has its re
Indeed. I think the root of the issue is deeper. ASF software practices are
great to deal with isolated, relatively contained projects like httpd,
libreoffice, trac, etc. However, Hadoop based stack - essentially, software
aimed at enterprises with bigger scale operations - is a different animal,
t
I'd like to spin-off a bugfix release for 2.0.4-alpha containing fix for
MAPREDUCE-5240
Vinod has the fix on branch-2 already, so it seems like a no-brainer backport.
However, the issue is blocking Bigtop 0.6.0 from being released on top of
2.0.4-alpha. I am planning to backport the fix into 2.0
Konstantin Boudnik created HADOOP-9528:
--
Summary:
org.apache.hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverController.testCedeActive is failing
intermittently
Key: HADOOP-9528
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP
To add to it, here's what have been experiences as a disconnect during the
release cycle of 2.0.4-alpha using BigTop 0.6.6 as the integration platform and
management stack of choice:
1. Need for improved feedback from the downstream projects
2. Need for improved feedback from the DevOps
W
-0
the release is missing HADOOP-9704 that has critical effect on downstream
projects e.g. build are affected. The issue has been raised for the first time
back in 4/10/13 http://is.gd/OGb3GG and never been even sneezed upon.
Cos
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 03:26AM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik reopened HADOOP-9407:
I think it needs to be added to branch-2.0.4-alpha as well before the release
goes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-9405.
Resolution: Fixed
I have committed the patch to 2.0.4-alpha branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik reopened HADOOP-9405:
Need to backport to branch-2.0.4
> TestGridmixSumm
Here's a daily build for hadoop-2 branch
https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-branch2
It just builds the full Hadoop project without running any tests (for now).
Can be easily extended to do test runs/artifact deployment, if needed.
Cos
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 07:14PM, Konstantin Bo
ache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4615?focusedCommentId=13612650&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13612650
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > It doesn't look like any progress
It doesn't look like any progress has been done on the ticket below in the
last 3 weeks. And now branch-2 can't be compiled because of
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/TestDFSShell.java:[895,15]
WINDOWS is not public in org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path; cannot be acce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-9399.
Resolution: Fixed
Release Note: Committed to 2.0.4-alpha branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-9299.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.4-alpha
Apparently it has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik reopened HADOOP-9299:
Backporting to 2.0.4-alpha
> kerberos name resolution is kicking
t; > Making two builds is less than 2 days work, imho, given that there is
> > a Windows node available and that mvn targets are in place. Correct me
> > if I missed any complications in the process.
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> > It seems t
Suresh, I appreciate all the troubles you're going through wrt syncing up the
huge patch for a long time - I really do.
I am not asking to have full test-patch process in place. But I think it is a
real good idea to have a way to run the full test suite once in a while - or
as Konstantin proposing
It seems that with the HW in place, the matter of setting at least nightly
build is trivial for anyone with up to date Windows knowledge. I wish I could
help. Going without a validation is a recipe for a disaster IMO.
-1 until some reasonable solution is implemented.
Cos
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 03:08PM, sanjay Radia wrote:
> +1
> Java has done the bulk of the work in making Hadoop multi-platform.
> Windows specific code is a tiny percentage of the code.
> Jeninks support for windows is going help us keep the platform portable going
> forward.
> I expect that the v
[yanking away most of the cross-posts...]
An interesting cross component project Avik. Any plans to incubate it in Apache?
Cos
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:46PM, Dey, Avik wrote:
> Project Rhino
>
> As the Apache Hadoop ecosystem extends into new markets and sees new use
> cases with security and
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:44PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> We've created BigTop stack with 2.0.3 as the base. Ran YCSB, slive, and some
> other loads on up to 20 nodes clusters as a part of the release validation.
> Two issues were noted:
>
> - due to the known issue with Je
We've created BigTop stack with 2.0.3 as the base. Ran YCSB, slive, and some
other loads on up to 20 nodes clusters as a part of the release validation.
Two issues were noted:
- due to the known issue with Jetty we are seeing MR jobs hanging here and
there
- without properly configured capacity-
The issue with the configuration is raised (and adressed) in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-841
Cos
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:25PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I downloaded the src tar ball, built it with the native bits enabled,
> started up a little cluster, and
Konstantin Boudnik created HADOOP-9231:
--
Summary: Parametrize staging URL for the uniformity of
distributionManagement
Key: HADOOP-9231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9231
Do I hear puppet? :)
Cos
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:08AM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> I agree -- I'd like to see us have a shell script of some sort which,
> given a prefix, downloads and installs the needed toolchain
> dependencies.
>
> We could then download that script onto the build machines and in
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 10:07PM, Eric Yang wrote:
> -1, +1, -1
>
> Python has fairly inconsistent support across all major OS vendors. It is
> hard to get it right unless the scripts are all designed to make use of
> Python 2.4. However, Python 2.4 doesn't have necessary OS features to make
> Py
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 10:44AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> On 1 December 2012 01:08, Eli Collins wrote:
>
> > -1, 0, -1
> >
> > IIUC the only platform we plan to add support for that we can't easily
> > support today (w/o an emulation layer like cygwin) is Windows, and it
> > seems like making the
-1, +1, -1
Thanks
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:13PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> For discussion, please see previous thread "[PROPOSAL] introduce Python as
> build-time and run-time dependency for Hadoop and throughout Hadoop stack".
>
> This vote consists of three separate items:
>
> 1. Contributors sha
If we decide to go with Maven then there's no point to complicate the
picture with jython. This time I will keep the offensive about *yton to myself
;)
Cos
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:26PM, Radim Kolar wrote:
> we have not discussed advantages of stand alone python vs
> jython-in-maven pom
>
> ht
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:58AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
> I know that Python compatibility can be worked around. I used Python
> for few years and wrote about 70k LOC in it until it started to
> irritate me that every new version has incompatibilities such as 2.4
> vs 2.3 vs 2.5 and it makes maintainin
Ditto...
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 01:14PM, Matt Foley wrote:
> Cos,
> Please see in-line.
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > I like Alejandro's idea about Maven for a few of reasons:
> > - bringing in a scripting en
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:46PM, Radim Kolar wrote:
>
> >Why not do a maven-plugin to do that?
> maven plugins are difficult to maintain. its better to use inline
> scripts, with something like this:
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GMAVEN/Home;jsessionid=E29093B96230BBB4461F02A1718A6B71
Exa
I like Alejandro's idea about Maven for a few of reasons:
- bringing in a scripting environment which is known for its inter-version
idiosyncrasies just because Windows can't handle trivial shell scripting
looks like an overkill to me
- relative to above, there's a chance that Python's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-8417.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to branch-1.1. Thank you Zhihong
Also, I have updated HADOOP-8417 against 1.1.0 and we need to include it.
Otherwise, 1.1 will have the same issues for the downstream projects as 1.0.3
had.
Cos
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 05:52PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> HADOOP-8399 would be
tted.
> I am planning to defer those two to 1.1.1.
>
> Beyond that, I'm going to cut 1.1.0-rc0 from the current state of
> branch-1.1.
> I'm planning to do that this weekend. This is obviously delayed from the
> previous plan, for which I apologize.
>
> Comments
Hi Matt.
I am picking up the hat of BigTop's maintainer for Hadoop 1.x line. And I
wanted to sync up with about the Hadoop 1.1 release outlook, progress, what help
you might need, etc.
I see a few jiras left open in the release
http://is.gd/OyuaNQ
Is this the correct representation of the cu
Sorry, did what? The page doesn't have any references to the BigTop as of now.
Cos
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 07:11PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Thanks!
> Note: Harsh J did it and give me karma to modify the page.
>
> --
> Olivier
>
>
> 2012/6/28 Konstantin Boudnik :
I will, I have the access.
Cos
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:52AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > What is the process to modify the page
> > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Distributions%20and%20Commercial%20Support
> > ?
>
> On a related n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved HADOOP-7084.
Resolution: Duplicate
This is a dup of Hadoop-7072
> Rem
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
