+1 (binding)
Arun
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:44 PM -0700, "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli"
mailto:vino...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi all,
I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0.
The RC is available at: http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/
The RC tag in git is: r
Colin,
Do you have a list of incompatible changes other than the shell-script
rewrite? If we do have others we'd have to fix them anyway for the current plan
on hadoop-3.x right? So, I don't see the difference?
Arun
From: Colin P. McCabe
Sent: Monday,
Steve,
From: Steve Loughran
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 2:15 PM
To: mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org;
common-dev@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Hadoop 3.x: what about shipping trunk as a 2.x release in 2
Over the last few days, we have had lots of discussions that have intertwined
several major themes:
# When/why do we make major Hadoop releases?
# When/how do we move to major JDK versions?
# To a lesser extent, we have debated another theme: what do we do about trunk?
For now, let's park
Awesome, looks like we can just do this in a compatible manner - nothing else
on the list seems like it warrants a (premature) major release.
Thanks Vinod.
Arun
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:30 PM
To: common-dev@hadoop.ap
Andrew,
Thanks for bringing up this discussion.
I'm a little puzzled for I feel like we are rehashing the same discussion from
last year - where we agreed on a different course of action w.r.t switch to
JDK7.
IAC, breaking compatibility for hadoop-3 is a pretty big cost - particularly
for
Sounds good, thanks for the help Vinod!
Arun
From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 11:43 AM
To: Hadoop Common; Jason Lowe; Arun Murthy
Subject: Re: 2.7 status
Agreed. How about we roll an RC end of this week? As a Java 7+ release
My bad, been sorted distracted.
I agree, we should just roll fwd a 2.7 ASAP with all the goodies.
What sort of timing makes sense? 2 week hence?
thanks,
Arun
From: Jason Lowe
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:11 AM
To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subje
Folks,
With hadoop-2.6 out it's time to think ahead.
As we've discussed in the past, 2.6 was the last release which supports JDK6.
I'm thinking it's best to try get 2.7 out in a few weeks (maybe by the
holidays) with just the switch to JDK7 (HADOOP-10530) and possibly
support for JDK-1.8 (as a r
Duh!
$ chmod a+r *
Please try now. Thanks!
Arun
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA
wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> Could you confirm the link and permission to the files is correct? I
> got a following error:
>
>
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access
> /~acmurthy/hadoop-2.6.0-
as already indicated
>> on
>>>>> the dev mailing list. Hopefully HDFS-6581 gets ready sooner. Both of
>>> these
>>>>> features are being in development for sometime.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Andrew Wang <
>
Looks like most of the content is in and hadoop-2.6 is shaping up nicely.
I'll create branch-2.6 by end of the week and we can go from there to
stabilize it - hopefully in the next few weeks.
Thoughts?
thanks,
Arun
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> Folks,
>
> With hadoo
Sorry, coming to discussion late.
We all agreed that 2.6 would the *last* release supporting JDK6 and
hadoop-2.7 would drop support for JDK6. We could easily do 2.7 right after
2.6 (maybe with few critical bug-fixes) with the defining feature of 2.7
being *JDK7 only*. I've checked with HBase, Pig
t 11:13 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur
> wrote:
>
> > agree with Steve, lets do a 2.5.1 just with those txt files.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Steve Loughran
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 19 August 2014 18:35, Arun Murthy wrote:
> > >
I suggest we do a 2.5.1 (with potentially other bug fixes) rather than fix
existing tarballs.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> Tsuyoshi just brought it to my notice that the published tarballs don't
> have LICENSE, NOTICE and README at the to
We don't involve press@ typically...
Arun
> On Aug 12, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote:
>
> Thanks Steve for pointing me to press@. I hadn't realized we need to
> include them. Just sent an email.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Steve Loughran
> wrote:
>
>> thanks for doing this
Alejandro,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur
wrote:
> After reading this thread and thinking a bit about it, I think it should be
> OK such move up to JDK7 in Hadoop 2 for the following reasons:
>
> * Existing Hadoop 2 releases and related projects are running
> on JDK7 in p
Thanks everyone. I'll start a vote tmrw if there are no objections.
Arun
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> +1, sounds good!
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Andrew Wang
> wrote:
>
> > +1 here as well, let's do a vote thread (for 7 days, maybe for the last
> > t
Akira,
Waiting for one more issue, stay tuned.
thanks,
Arun
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Akira AJISAKA
wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> I'd like to know when to release Hadoop 2.4.1.
> It looks like all of the blockers have been resolved.
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>
> (2014/04/24 5:59), Arun C Murthy w
Based on the discussion at common-dev@, we've decided to target 2.3
off the tip of branch-2 based on the 2 major HDFS features which are
Heterogenous Storage (HDFS-2832) and HDFS Cache (HDFS-4949).
I'll create a new branch-2.3 on (1/24) at 6pm PST.
thanks,
Arun
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE:
Sounds good, thanks. I'll ping you off-thread.
Arun
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> Hi Arun, thanks for the reply. I hope that I've come across as an earnest
> and motivated contributor who wants to help make high-quality releases.
> Volunteering myself as RM and pushing f
Thanks Vinod.
I'll start the work to re-spin 2.3 by changing jira numbers, CHANGES.txt
etc. now.
Arun
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
> Agree 2.3 is now very stale.
>
> So, as I understand, your motivatio
That makes sense too.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
wrote:
>
> We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited
> understanding, this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we
> not fix it in subsequent bug-fix releases?
>
> I do see a lo
Ok, I'll spin rc1 after. Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Siddharth Seth wrote:
> Arun, MAPREDUCE-5094 would be a useful jira to include in the 2.0.4-alpha
> release. It's not an absolute blocker since the values can be controlled
> explicitly by changing tests which us
Sounds great, I'll create the branch for you. Thanks for the your efforts
on this so far!
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Bikas Saha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> branch-1-win was created to stage the work needed to make Hadoop run
> natively on Windows. There has been great progress on it that all of us ca
Eli,
I'd check against the svn tag which corresponds to the release...
I'm traveling right now, let get back in a bit.
thanks,
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> Hey Arun,
>
> Was looking at the 23.0 release bits and noticed that the contents of
> bran
Depending on the version of Hadoop you are using, you can goto
http://:50030/scheduler to check.
This will work from hadoop-0.20.203 onwards.
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2011, at 5:38 PM, shivam tiwari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please tell me how I can check which scheduler is currently runnin
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> quick question: any reason we are ignoring multifilewc from hadoop examples?
>
Roman - It isn't marked as a blocker nor is there a patch.
Can you provide one?
Arun
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-3319
>
> wo
Awesome, thanks to both you guys! It's very exciting to see this progress!
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> FWIW: I can commit the OMPI part of your patch for you. The CCLA is intended
> to ensure that people realize the need to protect OMPI from "i
Tim,
It's highly unlikely you'll see a stable 0.21 at this point.
You can ask for a backport to 0.20.2xx (pls open a jira, better yet, a
patch :) ) or consider trying hadoop-0.23 which we just released. Fair
warning: 0.23 is very much 'alpha' quality currently.
thanks,
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
That is a normal use case.
I'd encourage you to use Java MR (even pig/hive).
If you really want to use your legacy app use streaming with a map cmd
such as 'hadoop fs -cat | mylegacyexe'
Arun
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 23, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Zhixuan Zhu wrote:
> I'll actually invoke one exec
31 matches
Mail list logo
