[GitHub] [hadoop-thirdparty] Apache9 commented on a change in pull request #1: HADOOP-16595. [pb-upgrade] Create hadoop-thirdparty artifact to have shaded protobuf

Apache9 commented on a change in pull request #1: HADOOP-16595. [pb-upgrade] Create hadoop-thirdparty artifact to have shaded protobuf URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/pull/1#discussion_r329297329 ## File path: pom.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,466 @@ + + +http://maven

[GitHub] [hadoop-thirdparty] Apache9 commented on a change in pull request #1: HADOOP-16595. [pb-upgrade] Create hadoop-thirdparty artifact to have shaded protobuf

Apache9 commented on a change in pull request #1: HADOOP-16595. [pb-upgrade] Create hadoop-thirdparty artifact to have shaded protobuf URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/pull/1#discussion_r329297473 ## File path: hadoop-shaded-protobuf/pom.xml ## @@ -0,0 +1,1

Re: [DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

For HBase we have a separated repo for hbase-thirdparty https://github.com/apache/hbase-thirdparty We will publish the artifacts to nexus so we do not need to include binaries in our git repo, just add a dependency in the pom. https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.hbase.thirdparty/hbase-

Re: [DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

Please find replies inline. -Vinay On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 10:21 PM Owen O'Malley wrote: > I'm very unhappy with this direction. In particular, I don't think git is > a good place for distribution of binary artifacts. Furthermore, the PMC > shouldn't be releasing anything without a release vote

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16613) contentType for fake directory files

Jose Torres created HADOOP-16613: Summary: contentType for fake directory files Key: HADOOP-16613 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16613 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bu

Re: [DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

I'm very unhappy with this direction. In particular, I don't think git is a good place for distribution of binary artifacts. Furthermore, the PMC shouldn't be releasing anything without a release vote. I'd propose that we make a third party module that contains the *source* of the pom files to bui

Daily Builds Getting Aborted Due To Timeout

Hi All, Just to bring into notice the hadoop daily builds are getting aborted due to timeout( Configured to be 900 Minutes). > Build timed out (after 900 minutes). Marking the build as aborted. > Build was aborted > [CHECKSTYLE] Skipping publisher since build result is ABORTED > [FINDBUGS] Skippin

[DISCUSS] About creation of Hadoop Thirdparty repository for shaded artifacts

Hi All, I wanted to discuss about the separate repo for thirdparty dependencies which we need to shaded and include in Hadoop component's jars. Apologies for the big text ahead, but this needs clear explanation!! Right now most needed such dependency is protobuf. Protobuf dependency was

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2+JDK7 on Linux/x86

For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/457/ [Sep 26, 2019 11:06:35 PM] (cliang) HDFS-14785. [SBN read] Change client logging to be less aggressive. -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: asflicense findbugs hadolint pathlen unit xm

Re: Release plans for Hadoop 2.10.0

Hi Wei-Chiu, Just got a chance to pull the jstack on a datanode that's showing high ReadBlockOpAvgTime and I found a few different scenarios: Lot of DataXceiver threads in the following state for a while java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking) at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)