Re: Incompatible changes between branch-2.8 and branch-2.9

2019-09-25 Thread Eric Badger
* For YARN-7813, not sure why moving from 2.8.4/5 -> 2.8.6 would be incompatible with this strategy? It should be OK to remove/add optional fields (removing the field with id 12, and adding the field with id 13) - A I misunderstood. I was thinking that the field was overwritten in branch-2.8

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16611) Make test4tests vote for -0 instead of -1

2019-09-25 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira)
Duo Zhang created HADOOP-16611: -- Summary: Make test4tests vote for -0 instead of -1 Key: HADOOP-16611 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16611 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: S

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16610) Upgrade to yetus 0.11.0 and use emoji vote on github pre commit

2019-09-25 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira)
Duo Zhang created HADOOP-16610: -- Summary: Upgrade to yetus 0.11.0 and use emoji vote on github pre commit Key: HADOOP-16610 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16610 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16609) Add Jenkinsfile for all active branches

2019-09-25 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira)
Duo Zhang created HADOOP-16609: -- Summary: Add Jenkinsfile for all active branches Key: HADOOP-16609 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16609 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16608) Improve the github pre commit job

2019-09-25 Thread Duo Zhang (Jira)
Duo Zhang created HADOOP-16608: -- Summary: Improve the github pre commit job Key: HADOOP-16608 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16608 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improveme

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16607) s3a attempts to look up password/encryption fail if JCEKS file unreadable

2019-09-25 Thread Steve Loughran (Jira)
Steve Loughran created HADOOP-16607: --- Summary: s3a attempts to look up password/encryption fail if JCEKS file unreadable Key: HADOOP-16607 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16607 Pro

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16529) Allow AZURE_CREATE_REMOTE_FILESYSTEM_DURING_INITIALIZATION to be set from abfs.xml property

2019-09-25 Thread Gabor Bota (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabor Bota resolved HADOOP-16529. - Resolution: Workaround > Allow AZURE_CREATE_REMOTE_FILESYSTEM_DURING_INITIALIZATION to be set f

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2+JDK7 on Linux/x86

2019-09-25 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/455/ [Sep 24, 2019 8:51:11 PM] (jhung) YARN-9730. Support forcing configured partitions to be exclusive based -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: asflicense findbugs hadolint pathlen unit x

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16606) checksum link from hadoop web site is broken.

2019-09-25 Thread Rohith Sharma K S (Jira)
Rohith Sharma K S created HADOOP-16606: -- Summary: checksum link from hadoop web site is broken. Key: HADOOP-16606 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16606 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16605) NPE in TestAdlSdkConfiguration failing in yetus

2019-09-25 Thread Steve Loughran (Jira)
Steve Loughran created HADOOP-16605: --- Summary: NPE in TestAdlSdkConfiguration failing in yetus Key: HADOOP-16605 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16605 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 release

2019-09-25 Thread Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Done: https://twitter.com/hadoop/status/1176787511865008128. If you have tweetdeck, any of the PMC members can do this. BTW, it looks we haven't published any releases since Nov 2018. Let's get back to doing this going forward! Thanks +Vinod > On Sep 25, 2019, at 2:44 PM, Rohith Sharma K S >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 release

2019-09-25 Thread Rohith Sharma K S
Updated twitter message: `` Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 is released: https://s.apache.org/96r4h Announcement: https://s.apache.org/jhnpe Overview: https://s.apache.org/tht6a Changes: https://s.apache.org/pd6of Release notes: https://s.apache.org/ta50b Thanks to our community of developers, o

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 release

2019-09-25 Thread Rohith Sharma K S
Updated announcement Hi all, It gives us great pleasure to announce that the Apache Hadoop community has voted to release Apache Hadoop 3.2.1. Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 is the stable release of Apache Hadoop 3.2 line, which includes 493 fixes since Hadoop 3.2.0 release

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16604) Provide copy functionality for cloud native applications

2019-09-25 Thread Rajesh Balamohan (Jira)
Rajesh Balamohan created HADOOP-16604: - Summary: Provide copy functionality for cloud native applications Key: HADOOP-16604 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16604 Project: Hadoop C

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 release

2019-09-25 Thread Rohith Sharma K S
Can someone help to post this in twitter account? Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 is released: https://s.apache.org/mzdb6 Overview: https://s.apache.org/tht6a Changes: https://s.apache.org/pd6of Release notes: https://s.apache.org/ta50b Thanks to our community of developers, operators, and users. -Rohith Sh

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 release

2019-09-25 Thread Rohith Sharma K S
Hi all, It gives us great pleasure to announce that the Apache Hadoop community has voted to release Apache Hadoop 3.2.1. Apache Hadoop 3.2.1 is the stable release of Apache Hadoop 3.2 line, which includes 493 fixes since Hadoop 3.2.0 release: - For major changes included in Hadoop 3.2 line,

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16603) Lack of aarch64 platform support of dependent PhantomJS

2019-09-25 Thread liusheng (Jira)
liusheng created HADOOP-16603: - Summary: Lack of aarch64 platform support of dependent PhantomJS Key: HADOOP-16603 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16603 Project: Hadoop Common I

Re: Incompatible changes between branch-2.8 and branch-2.9

2019-09-25 Thread Robert Kanter
> > * For YARN-6050, there's a bit here: > https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto that says > "optional is compatible with repeated", so I think we should be OK there. > - Optional is compatible with repeatable over the wire such that > protobuf won't blow up, but does that a