>
> One major point from my end is that the commits to new repo ideally should
> happen from committers or branch committers.
Definitely agree!
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:32 PM Sunil Govindan wrote:
> Thanks Wangda for sharing the thoughts.
>
> I agree with the idea of new repo for more cleane
Akira Ajisaka created HADOOP-16527:
--
Summary: Add a whitelist of endpoints to allow simple
authentication even if security is enabled
Key: HADOOP-16527
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16527
Thanks Wangda for sharing the thoughts.
I agree with the idea of new repo for more cleaner code base and remove
additional dependencies, jenkins etc.
One major point from my end is that the commits to new repo ideally should
happen from committers or branch committers.
As hadoop community, we cou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Akira Ajisaka resolved HADOOP-16061.
Fix Version/s: 3.1.3
3.2.1
3.3.0
Resolution:
Todd Lipcon created HADOOP-16526:
Summary: Support LDAP authenticaition (bind) via GSSAPI
Key: HADOOP-16526
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16526
Project: Hadoop Common
Issu
Thank you Wei-Chiu for organizing this and sending out notes!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:10 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
> We had a great turnout today, thanks to Konstantin for leading the
> discussion of the NameNode Fine-Grained Locking proposal.
>
> There were at least 16 participants joined the
+1
Thanks,
Masatake Iwasaki
On 8/21/19 12:02, Wangda Tan wrote:
Hi all,
This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
Please feel free to share your th
Todd Lipcon created HADOOP-16525:
Summary: LDAP group mapping should include primary posix group
Key: HADOOP-16525
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16525
Project: Hadoop Common
We had a great turnout today, thanks to Konstantin for leading the
discussion of the NameNode Fine-Grained Locking proposal.
There were at least 16 participants joined the call.
Today's summary can be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jXM5Ujvf-zhcyw_5kiQVx6g-HeKe-YGnFS_1-qFXomI/edit
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:52 AM Kihwal Lee
wrote:
> +1
>
> Kihwal
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion
Kihwal Lee created HADOOP-16524:
---
Summary: Automatic keystore reloading for HttpServer2
Key: HADOOP-16524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16524
Project: Hadoop Common
Issue Ty
+1
Haibo
From: Erik Krogen
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 08:28
To: Jonathan Eagles ; Sunil Govindan
Cc: Wangda Tan ; yarn-dev ;
Hdfs-dev ; mapreduce-dev
; Hadoop Common
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1 thanks for initiating an of
+1
Kihwal
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to sha
+1 thanks for initiating an official vote Wangda!
From: Jonathan Eagles
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 8:22 AM
To: Sunil Govindan
Cc: Wangda Tan ; yarn-dev ;
Hdfs-dev ; mapreduce-dev
; Hadoop Common
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Mark 2.6, 2.7, 3.0 release lines EOL
+1
+1.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:15 AM Sunil Govindan wrote:
> +1
>
> - Sunil
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This disc
+1
- Sunil
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to sha
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Sean Busbey
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs fo
+1
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to share your
Let's go with bi-weekly (every 2 weeks). Sometimes this gives us 3 sync-ups in
one month, which I think is fine.
-Eric Payne
On Wednesday, August 21, 2019, 5:01:52 AM CDT, Wangda Tan
wrote:
>
> For folks in other US time zones: how about 11am PDT, is it better or 10am
> PDT will be better? I
For more details, see
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/420/
[Aug 20, 2019 5:38:52 PM] (weichiu) HDFS-14311. Multi-threading conflict at
layoutVersion when loading block
-1 overall
The following subsystems voted -1:
asflicense findbugs hadolint pathlen un
+1
-Dinesh
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:22 AM Akira Ajisaka wrote:
> +1
>
> -Akira
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung
> wrote:
> >
> > +1. Thanks!
> >
> > Jonathan Hung
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a vote t
For folks in other US time zones: how about 11am PDT, is it better or 10am
PDT will be better? I will be fine with both.
Hi Matt,
Thanks for mentioning this issue, this is the exactly issue I saw 🤣.
Basically there’re two options:
- a. weekly, bi-weekly (for odd/even week) and every four months
+1
-Akira
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 PM Jonathan Hung wrote:
>
> +1. Thanks!
>
> Jonathan Hung
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions
Hi Rohith
Thank you for initiating this
Few critical/blocker jira's we could consider
YARN-9714
YARN-9642
YARN-9640
Regards
Bibin
-Original Message-
From: Rohith Sharma K S [mailto:rohithsharm...@apache.org]
Sent: 21 August 2019 11:42
To: Wei-Chiu Chuang
Cc: Hdfs-dev ; yarn-dev
; ma
24 matches
Mail list logo
