Re: Any thoughts making Submarine a separate Apache project?

2019-07-17 Thread sid yu
+1 We are look forward to it. The idea is great. > On Jul 10, 2019, at 3:34 PM, Xun Liu wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is Xun Liu contributing to the Submarine project for deep learning > workloads running with big data workloads together on Hadoop clusters. > > There are a bunch of integrations

Re: Any thoughts making Submarine a separate Apache project?

2019-07-17 Thread sid yu
+1 We are look forward to it. The idea is great. > On Jul 10, 2019, at 3:34 PM, Xun Liu wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is Xun Liu contributing to the Submarine project for deep learning > workloads running with big data workloads together on Hadoop clusters. > > There are a bunch of integrations

Re: [VOTE] Force "squash and merge" option for PR merge on github UI

2019-07-17 Thread Da Zhou
sounds good! +1 Regards, Da > On Jul 17, 2019, at 7:32 PM, Dinesh Chitlangia > wrote: > > +1, this is certainly useful. > > Thank you, > Dinesh > > > > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:04 PM Akira Ajisaka wrote: >> >> Makes sense, +1 >> >>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:01 AM Sangjin Lee w

Re: [VOTE] Force "squash and merge" option for PR merge on github UI

2019-07-17 Thread Dinesh Chitlangia
+1, this is certainly useful. Thank you, Dinesh On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:04 PM Akira Ajisaka wrote: > Makes sense, +1 > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:01 AM Sangjin Lee wrote: > > > > +1. Sounds good to me. > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:20 AM Iñigo Goiri wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Force "squash and merge" option for PR merge on github UI

2019-07-17 Thread Akira Ajisaka
Makes sense, +1 On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:01 AM Sangjin Lee wrote: > > +1. Sounds good to me. > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:20 AM Iñigo Goiri wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:17 AM Steve Loughran > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 for squash and merge, with whoever does the merge ad

Re: [VOTE] Force "squash and merge" option for PR merge on github UI

2019-07-17 Thread Sangjin Lee
+1. Sounds good to me. On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:20 AM Iñigo Goiri wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:17 AM Steve Loughran > > wrote: > > > +1 for squash and merge, with whoever does the merge adding the full > commit > > message for the logs, with JIRA, contributor(s) etc > > > > One l

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16437) Documentation typos: fs.s3a.experimental.fadvise -> fs.s3a.experimental.input.fadvise

2019-07-17 Thread Josh Rosen (JIRA)
Josh Rosen created HADOOP-16437: --- Summary: Documentation typos: fs.s3a.experimental.fadvise -> fs.s3a.experimental.input.fadvise Key: HADOOP-16437 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16437

Re: [VOTE] Force "squash and merge" option for PR merge on github UI

2019-07-17 Thread Iñigo Goiri
+1 On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:17 AM Steve Loughran wrote: > +1 for squash and merge, with whoever does the merge adding the full commit > message for the logs, with JIRA, contributor(s) etc > > One limit of the github process is that the author of the commit becomes > whoever hit the squash butto

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: trunk+JDK8 on Linux/x86

2019-07-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/1200/ [Jul 16, 2019 2:44:27 AM] (ayushsaxena) HDFS-14642. processMisReplicatedBlocks does not return correct processed [Jul 16, 2019 4:51:59 AM] (github) HDDS-1736. Cleanup 2phase old HA code for Key requests.

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16436) Fix ITestS3GuardToolLocal#testInitNegativeRead test failure

2019-07-17 Thread Gabor Bota (JIRA)
Gabor Bota created HADOOP-16436: --- Summary: Fix ITestS3GuardToolLocal#testInitNegativeRead test failure Key: HADOOP-16436 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16436 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-16383) Pass ITtlTimeProvider instance in initialize method in MetadataStore interface

2019-07-17 Thread Gabor Bota (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gabor Bota resolved HADOOP-16383. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.3.0 > Pass ITtlTimeProvider instance in initialize me

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2+JDK7 on Linux/x86

2019-07-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/385/ [Jul 16, 2019 2:22:45 PM] (xkrogen) HDFS-14547. Improve memory efficiency of quotas when storage type quotas [Jul 16, 2019 10:50:24 PM] (iwasakims) HADOOP-16386. FindBugs warning in branch-2: GlobalStora

Re: [VOTE] Force "squash and merge" option for PR merge on github UI

2019-07-17 Thread Steve Loughran
+1 for squash and merge, with whoever does the merge adding the full commit message for the logs, with JIRA, contributor(s) etc One limit of the github process is that the author of the commit becomes whoever hit the squash button, not whoever did the code, so it loses the credit they are due. Thi

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16435) RpcMetrics should not be retained forever

2019-07-17 Thread Zoltan Haindrich (JIRA)
Zoltan Haindrich created HADOOP-16435: - Summary: RpcMetrics should not be retained forever Key: HADOOP-16435 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16435 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: [VOTE] Force "squash and merge" option for PR merge on github UI

2019-07-17 Thread Gabor Bota
+1 Good idea. On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 9:37 AM Ayush Saxena wrote: > Thanks Marton, Makes Sense +1 > > > On 17-Jul-2019, at 11:37 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Github UI (ui!) helps to merge Pull Requests to the proposed branch. > > There are three different ways to do it [1]: > >

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-16434) Expose an api which provides current active configurations set in .xml files.

2019-07-17 Thread Ashish Doneriya (JIRA)
Ashish Doneriya created HADOOP-16434: Summary: Expose an api which provides current active configurations set in .xml files. Key: HADOOP-16434 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16434

Re: [VOTE] Force "squash and merge" option for PR merge on github UI

2019-07-17 Thread Ayush Saxena
Thanks Marton, Makes Sense +1 > On 17-Jul-2019, at 11:37 AM, Elek, Marton wrote: > > Hi, > > Github UI (ui!) helps to merge Pull Requests to the proposed branch. > There are three different ways to do it [1]: > > 1. Keep all the different commits from the PR branch and create one > additional

Re: Re: Any thoughts making Submarine a separate Apache project?

2019-07-17 Thread dashuiguailu...@gmail.com
+1 ,Good idea, we are very much looking forward to it. dashuiguailu...@gmail.com From: Szilard Nemeth Date: 2019-07-17 14:55 To: runlin zhang CC: Xun Liu; Hadoop Common; yarn-dev; Hdfs-dev; mapreduce-dev; submarine-dev Subject: Re: Any thoughts making Submarine a separate Apache project? +1, t