[UPDATE] Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

Jenkins is running a full test run on trunk using protoc 2.5.0. https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk/480 And it seems go be going just fine. If everything looks OK, I'm planing to backport HADOOP-9845 to the 2.1.0-beta branch midday PST tomorrow. This will normalize all builds failures d

Re: protobuf upgrade on Jenkins slaves causing build failures?

Hey Chris, Yep the protobuf version on the machine was upped. We have a parallel ongoing discussion on the same lists under the title "Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release" which you can follow for the updates being done. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > I'm cu

Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

shooting to get it i n for 2.1.0. at moment is in trunk till the nightly finishes. then we'll decide in the mean time, you can have multiple versions installed in diff dirs and set the right one in the path thx Alejandro (phone typing) On Aug 12, 2013, at 17:47, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:

Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

Ok. After installing protobuf 2.5.0 I can compile trunk. But now I cannot compile Hadoop-2 branches. None of them. So if I switch between branches I need to reinstall protobuf? Is there a consensus about going towards protobuf 2.5.0 upgrade in ALL versions? I did not get definite impression there

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9866) convert hadoop-auth testcases requiring kerberos to use minikdc

Alejandro Abdelnur created HADOOP-9866: -- Summary: convert hadoop-auth testcases requiring kerberos to use minikdc Key: HADOOP-9866 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9866 Project:

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9527) Add symlink support to LocalFileSystem on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arpit Agarwal resolved HADOOP-9527. --- Resolution: Fixed > Add symlink support to LocalFileSystem on Windows >

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9865) FileContext.globStatus() has a regression with respect to relative path

Chuan Liu created HADOOP-9865: - Summary: FileContext.globStatus() has a regression with respect to relative path Key: HADOOP-9865 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9865 Project: Hadoop Com

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-9789) Support server advertised kerberos principals

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Omkar Vinit Joshi reopened HADOOP-9789: --- Reopening as it is failing in trunk. > Support server advertised kerber

Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

I've just committed HADOOP-9845 to trunk (only trunk at the moment). To build trunk now you need protoc 2.5.0 (the build will fail with a warning if you don't have it). We'd propagate this to the 2 branches once the precommit build is back to normal and see things are OK. Thanks. On Mon, Aug 1

Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

About to commit HADOOP-9845 to trunk, in 5 mins. This will make trunk use protoc 2.5.0. thx On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Giridharan Kesavan < gkesa...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > I can take care of re-installing 2.4 and installing 2.5 in a different > location. This would fix 2.0 branch buil

Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

I can take care of re-installing 2.4 and installing 2.5 in a different location. This would fix 2.0 branch builds as well. Thoughts? -Giri On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > Giri, > > first of all, thanks for installing protoc 2.5.0. > > I didn't know we were installi

Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

Giri, first of all, thanks for installing protoc 2.5.0. I didn't know we were installing them as the only version and not driven by env/path settings. Now we have a bit of a problem, precommit builds are broken because of mismatch of protoc (2.5.0) and protobuf JAR( 2.4.1). We have to options:

Re: Upgrade to protobuf 2.5.0 for the 2.1.0 release, HADOOP-9845

Like I said protoc is upgraded from 2.4 to 2.5. 2.5 is in the default path. If we still need 2.4 I may have to install it. Let me know -Giri On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > thanks giri, how do we set 2.4 or 2.5., what is the path to both so we can > use and env to s

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9864) Adopt SLF4Js over commons-logging

Steve Loughran created HADOOP-9864: -- Summary: Adopt SLF4Js over commons-logging Key: HADOOP-9864 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9864 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Imp

protobuf upgrade on Jenkins slaves causing build failures?

I'm curious if protobuf may have been upgraded to 2.5.0 on the Jenkins slaves, ahead of committing the Hadoop code's dependency upgrade to 2.5.0. We've started to see build failures due to cannot find symbol com.google.protobuf.Parser. This is the earliest example I could find, which happened 8/1

Re: UNSUBSRIBE

Hi Nitin, To unsubscribe, send an email to common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org More info is found at http://hadoop.apache.org/mailing_lists.html#Developers Regards, Vivek Ganesan On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Nitin Gupta wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:49 AM, kumar chandan (JIRA)

UNSUBSRIBE

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:49 AM, kumar chandan (JIRA) wrote: > kumar chandan created HADOOP-9794: > - > > Summary: dsdfyy > Key: HADOOP-9794 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9794 > P

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-Common-trunk #858

See -- [...truncated 18668 lines...] [ERROR] symbol : class Parser [ERROR] location: package com.google.protobuf [ERROR]