+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Sandy Ryza wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Derek Dagit wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On May 17, 2013, at 4:14 PM, "Thomas Graves"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > We've had a few critical iss
+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Derek Dagit wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On May 17, 2013, at 4:14 PM, "Thomas Graves"
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We've had a few critical issues come up in 0.23.7 that I think warrants a
> > 0.23.8 release. The main one is MAPREDUCE-521
+1 (non-binding)
On May 17, 2013, at 4:14 PM, "Thomas Graves" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We've had a few critical issues come up in 0.23.7 that I think warrants a
> 0.23.8 release. The main one is MAPREDUCE-5211. There are a couple of
> other issues that I want finished up and get in before we sp
+1 (non-binding)
BTW, I left a comment on HDFS-4835 suggesting that you include HDFS-3180
for WebHDFS socket connect/read timeouts. It's up to you. (I'm voting +1
for the release plan either way.)
Chris Nauroth
Hortonworks
http://hortonworks.com/
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Eli Collins
