Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-13 Thread Hemanth Yamijala
Map/Reduce would benefit too from the extended date (Sept 18). I still think Owen's latest proposal is more suitable. Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze wrote: seems that the Nigel's previous suggestion (i.e. append Sept 18, others Sept 4) is better. For your reference, attached the previous message thr

[jira] Created: (HADOOP-6193) JobTracker jobconf.jsp/job.xml should include or tags.

2009-08-13 Thread Adam Kramer (JIRA)
JobTracker jobconf.jsp/job.xml should include or tags. - Key: HADOOP-6193 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6193 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Created: (HADOOP-6192) Shell.getUlimitMemoryCommand is tied to Map-Reduce

2009-08-13 Thread Arun C Murthy (JIRA)
Shell.getUlimitMemoryCommand is tied to Map-Reduce -- Key: HADOOP-6192 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6192 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug Components: util

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-13 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze
It seems that the Nigel's previous suggestion (i.e. append Sept 18, others Sept 4) is better. For your reference, attached the previous message thread "[VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21" at the end . Nicholas Sze - Original Message > From: Nigel Daley > To: common-dev@hadoop.a

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-13 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze
seems that the Nigel's previous suggestion (i.e. append Sept 18, others Sept 4) is better. For your reference, attached the previous message thread "[VOTE] Push back code freeze for 0.21" at the end . Nicholas Sze - Original Message > From: Nigel Daley > To: common-dev@hadoop.apa

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-13 Thread Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze
- Original Message > From: Nigel Daley > To: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 2:23:24 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21 > > +1 > On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > > > All, > > After the discuss

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-13 Thread Nigel Daley
+1 On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: All, After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs more time to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze time of 4:30 pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce.

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-13 Thread Matei Zaharia
+1 On Aug 13, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Chris Douglas wrote: +1 On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: All, After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs more time to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze time of 4:30 pst on 18 Sep

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-13 Thread Chris Douglas
+1 On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > All, >   After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs more time > to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze time of > 4:30 pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and > MapRed

Re: [VOTE] Freeze date for Common, HDFS, and MapReduce 0.21

2009-08-13 Thread Arun C Murthy
+1 Arun On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:04 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: All, After the discussion settled last time, it seems that HDFS needs more time to settle append and sync. Therefore, I'd like to propose a freeze time of 4:30 pst on 18 Sep for making the 0.21 branch for Common, HDFS, and MapRe