[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] Dan-guanghua opened a new pull request #538: system: nxlooper: add nxlooper for loopback test

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
Dan-guanghua opened a new pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/538 which record and play raw data using audio subsystem to verify audio record and playback function Signed-off-by: danguanghua Change-Id: I2c768b8e8234a31f9622cb9955f

[incubator-nuttx-apps] branch master updated: testing/irtest: Remove an unused function

2020-12-22 Thread xiaoxiang
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-apps.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new 961ffac testing/irtest: Remove

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #537: testing/irtest: Remove an unused function

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #537: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/537 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

[incubator-nuttx] branch master updated (c694719 -> 073912e)

2020-12-22 Thread xiaoxiang
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git. from c694719 Bluetooth: Fix bt_buff lifecycle add 073912e Replace all wget with curl No new revisions

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2582: Replace all wget with curl

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2582: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2582 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

[incubator-nuttx] branch master updated (073912e -> 0fbfc4c)

2020-12-22 Thread xiaoxiang
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git. from 073912e Replace all wget with curl add 0fbfc4c esp32_wifi_adapter.c: file mode for open doesn't ma

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #2584: esp32_wifi_adapter.c: file mode for open doesn't make sense for O_RDONLY

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #2584: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2584#discussion_r547170882 ## File path: arch/xtensa/src/esp32/esp32_wifi_adapter.c ## @@ -3111,7 +3111,7 @@ static int32_t esp_nvs_get_blob(uint32_t handle,

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2584: esp32_wifi_adapter.c: file mode for open doesn't make sense for O_RDONLY

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2584: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2584 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] anchao commented on pull request #2574: libs/libc/dumpbuffer: dump buffer enhancement

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
anchao commented on pull request #2574: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2574#issuecomment-749458345 > @anchao since this buffer dumping is used on some of the small targets for debugging I am a little worried about what this does to the code size. Do you think we can ke

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #2585: libc/netdb: Move hostbuffer out of the stack

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #2585: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2585 ## Summary The length of hostbuffer come from Kconfig, it isn't safe to allocate this variable on the stack. ## Impact The stack consumption for getaddrinfo become small

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] FASTSHIFT closed pull request #532: lvgl porting and lvgl demo decoupling

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
FASTSHIFT closed pull request #532: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/532 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL ab

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] FASTSHIFT commented on pull request #532: lvgl porting and lvgl demo decoupling

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
FASTSHIFT commented on pull request #532: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/532#issuecomment-749517113 @v01d I understand what you mean. I'll close it. This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] patacongo commented on pull request #538: system: nxlooper: add nxlooper for loopback test

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/538#issuecomment-749528043 Should this go under apps/testing instead of apps/system? This is an automated message from the Ap

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #538: system: nxlooper: add nxlooper for loopback test

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/538#issuecomment-749542494 > Should this go under apps/testing instead of apps/system? Other two audio tools put to apps/system: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/

[incubator-nuttx] branch master updated (0fbfc4c -> 922cf06)

2020-12-22 Thread acassis
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. acassis pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git. from 0fbfc4c esp32_wifi_adapter.c: file mode for open doesn't make sense for O_RDONLY add 922cf06 libc/n

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] acassis merged pull request #2585: libc/netdb: Move hostbuffer out of the stack

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
acassis merged pull request #2585: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2585 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above t

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] patacongo commented on pull request #538: system: nxlooper: add nxlooper for loopback test

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/538#issuecomment-749550268 > > > > Should this go under apps/testing instead of apps/system? > > Other two audio tools put to apps/system: > https://github.com/apache/incubat

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #538: system: nxlooper: add nxlooper for loopback test

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/538#issuecomment-749613212 > > > Should this go under apps/testing instead of apps/system? > > > > > > Other two audio tools put to apps/system: > > https://github.com/apa

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] xiaoxiang781216 edited a comment on pull request #538: system: nxlooper: add nxlooper for loopback test

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 edited a comment on pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/538#issuecomment-749613212 > > > Should this go under apps/testing instead of apps/system? > > > > > > Other two audio tools put to apps/system: > > https://github.

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] xiaoxiang781216 edited a comment on pull request #538: system: nxlooper: add nxlooper for loopback test

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 edited a comment on pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/538#issuecomment-749613212 > > > Should this go under apps/testing instead of apps/system? > > > > > > Other two audio tools put to apps/system: > > https://github.

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-apps] xiaoxiang781216 edited a comment on pull request #538: system: nxlooper: add nxlooper for loopback test

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 edited a comment on pull request #538: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/538#issuecomment-749613212 > > > Should this go under apps/testing instead of apps/system? > > > > > > Other two audio tools put to apps/system: > > https://github.

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 opened a new issue #2586: Should we put Linux specific interfaces(e.g. netlink, eventfd) to include/linux folder?

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new issue #2586: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/2586 Which could improve the source code compatiblity, also tell user that these interfaces come from Linux. Now, these public interfaces put into nuttx folder.

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] saramonteiro opened a new pull request #2587: xtensa/esp32: Fixed wdt typos

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
saramonteiro opened a new pull request #2587: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2587 ## Summary It was fixed a typo. `wtd` was replaced by `wdt` in all watchdog files. ## Impact All ESP32 WDT users. ## Testing Each WDT was individually tested using

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] michallenc opened a new pull request #2588: St7789

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
michallenc opened a new pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588 ## Summary These commits add support for ST7789 controller based on ST7735 and following changes to boards/arm/imxrt/teensy-4.x to support ER-TFT1.14-1 over SPI on Teensy 4.x.

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] acassis commented on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
acassis commented on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749731415 Hi @michallenc very nice contribution, it will be useful for LILYGO TTGO modules that uses the same LCD controller. There is a compilation warning promoted to error: i

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] Ouss4 merged pull request #2587: xtensa/esp32: Fixed wdt typos

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
Ouss4 merged pull request #2587: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2587 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[incubator-nuttx] branch master updated (922cf06 -> 6a61213)

2020-12-22 Thread aguettouche
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. aguettouche pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git. from 922cf06 libc/netdb: Move hostbuffer out of the stack add 6a61213 xtensa/esp32: Fixed wdt typos

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] michallenc commented on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
michallenc commented on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749742089 > Hi @michallenc very nice contribution, it will be useful for LILYGO TTGO modules that uses the same LCD controller. > There is a compilation warning promoted to e

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo commented on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749781782 > > > > Hi @michallenc very nice contribution, it will be useful for LILYGO TTGO modules that uses the same LCD controller. > > There is a compilation warnin

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749781782 > > > > Hi @michallenc very nice contribution, it will be useful for LILYGO TTGO modules that uses the same LCD controller. > > There is a compilation

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo commented on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749786530 > The only safe and portable way to do this is with a cast: Use %lx then cast the argument to (unsigned long). I did that a lot, but the only truly standard and

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749786530 > The only safe and portable way to do this is with a cast: Use %lx then cast the argument to (unsigned long). I did that a lot, but the only truly standa

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749786530 > The only safe and portable way to do this is with a cast: Use %lx then cast the argument to (unsigned long). I did that a lot, but the only truly standa

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749781782 > > > > Hi @michallenc very nice contribution, it will be useful for LILYGO TTGO modules that uses the same LCD controller. > > There is a compilation

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo edited a comment on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749786530 > One safe and portable way to do this is with a cast: Use %lx then cast the argument to (unsigned long). I did that a lot, but the only truly standard an

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] michallenc commented on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
michallenc commented on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749811795 > > One safe and portable way to do this is with a cast: Use %lx then cast the argument to (unsigned long). > > I did that a lot, but the only truly standard an

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] patacongo commented on pull request #2588: Support for ST7789 controller

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
patacongo commented on pull request #2588: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2588#issuecomment-749837878 > The %x / %lx problem was in arch/arm/src/imxrt/imxrt_lpspi.c file, not in common drivers/ directory, so why are we worried about other architectures? Yes, that

[incubator-nuttx-website] branch asf-site updated: Publishing web: 1d65847df020becad8aaf7f02f01a93bc9e03ba9 docs: 6a6121378c68ab6c05f6ae77588e1cfa50c5a0bb

2020-12-22 Thread github-bot
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. github-bot pushed a commit to branch asf-site in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-website.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push: new e9a318d Publishing web

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] liangzhanggb opened a new pull request #2589: arch/risc-v:fix redefined CSR_INSTRET

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
liangzhanggb opened a new pull request #2589: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2589 ## Summary fix redefined CSR_INSTRET ## Impact remove build warning ## Testing NONE This is an automate

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] no1wudi opened a new pull request #2590: boards/risc-v/k210: Fix arch flag since NuttX don't support FPU

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
no1wudi opened a new pull request #2590: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2590 ## Summary NuttX don't support FPU for risc-v now, let's fix the arch flag to avoid compiler generate hardware float instruction, it would cause fault. ## Impact None ## Testing

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #2591: fs: Remove the softlink check from unlink

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #2591: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2591 ## Summary since the softlink is a special node too(include/nuttx/fs.h): ``` #define FSNODEFLAG_TYPE_MASK 0x000f /* Isolates type field */ #define FSNODEFLAG

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] no1wudi commented on pull request #2590: boards/risc-v/k210: Fix arch flag since NuttX don't support FPU

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
no1wudi commented on pull request #2590: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2590#issuecomment-749976095 CI failure: https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/issues/116 This is an automated message from the

[incubator-nuttx] branch art-failure created (now 8ec9d9e)

2020-12-22 Thread btashton
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. btashton pushed a change to branch art-failure in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git. at 8ec9d9e CI: Allow builds to pass even if final artifact upload fails This branch includes the follo

[incubator-nuttx] 01/01: CI: Allow builds to pass even if final artifact upload fails

2020-12-22 Thread btashton
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. btashton pushed a commit to branch art-failure in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git commit 8ec9d9e2457e8527749f05dc37a145b8d38b9372 Author: Brennan Ashton AuthorDate: Tue Dec 22 23:06:12 2020 -08

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] btashton opened a new pull request #2592: CI: Allow builds to pass even if final artifact upload fails

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
btashton opened a new pull request #2592: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2592 ## Summary We are seeing higher cases of artifact upload failures in github. Other projects are also seeing this as has been reported at https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/iss

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] btashton commented on pull request #2590: boards/risc-v/k210: Fix arch flag since NuttX don't support FPU

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
btashton commented on pull request #2590: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2590#issuecomment-749980669 @no1wudi :( Looks like GitHub actually made a fix recently in the base library so hopefully this will go away, but in the mean time I opened this https://github.com/apa

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2589: arch/risc-v:fix redefined CSR_INSTRET

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2589: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2589 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #2590: boards/risc-v/k210: Fix arch flag since NuttX don't support FPU

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #2590: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2590#issuecomment-749988318 Should we support fpu instead? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[incubator-nuttx] branch master updated (6a61213 -> b074ebe)

2020-12-22 Thread xiaoxiang
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git. from 6a61213 xtensa/esp32: Fixed wdt typos add b074ebe fix redefined CSR_INSTRET No new revisions were

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] no1wudi commented on pull request #2590: boards/risc-v/k210: Fix arch flag since NuttX don't support FPU

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
no1wudi commented on pull request #2590: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2590#issuecomment-749993147 > Should we support fpu instead? I think FPU support is another topic, because current rv32/rv64 arch support have many duplicated code, maybe we should cleanup th

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #2590: boards/risc-v/k210: Fix arch flag since NuttX don't support FPU

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #2590: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2590#issuecomment-749993147 > Should we support fpu instead? I think FPU support is another topic, because current rv32/rv64 arch support have many duplicated code, maybe we should cle

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #2590: boards/risc-v/k210: Fix arch flag since NuttX don't support FPU

2020-12-22 Thread GitBox
no1wudi edited a comment on pull request #2590: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2590#issuecomment-749993147 > Should we support fpu instead? I think FPU support is another topic, because current rv32/rv64 arch support have many duplicated code, maybe we should cle