xiaoxiang781216 closed pull request #16283: wqueue: improve the robustness of
the work
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283#issuecomment-2848417920
But, this problem is fixed by https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16231
too, so let's review and merge that patch instead.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git S
cederom commented on PR #16283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283#issuecomment-2842450854
This is interesting change, but we need to make sure it won't break
anything. Hardware tests are welcome and required as stated by @acassis.
We have short break right now in PL, I w
simbit18 commented on PR #16283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283#issuecomment-2841154599
Hi @cederom at the moment this is a known bug of msys2 on GitHub #16010
(Nuttx issue).
Workaround is to restart the msys2 CI Job, and it will succeed. If it
doesn't, try again.
cederom commented on PR #16283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283#issuecomment-2840184543
Hmm this msys2 worked fine in previous PRs o_O
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
acassis commented on PR #16283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283#issuecomment-2839938147
Added tag requiring more tests. Core functions not well tested on real
hardware are prone to break the system!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
simbit18 commented on PR #16283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283#issuecomment-2838230150
@lupyuen @xiaoxiang781216 I think it is necessary to stop the msys2 job that
went into error
```
1806443548 [sig] make 39741 sig_send: error sending signal 11, pid 39741,
pipe
nuttxpr commented on PR #16283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283#issuecomment-2837424604
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, al
GUIDINGLI opened a new pull request, #16283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16283
## Summary
struct work_s
{
union
{
struct
{
struct dq_entry_s dq; /* Implements a double linked list */
clock_t qtime; /* Time work