cederom commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2858252790
Another problem I can see is "Commits must have verified signatures.".
Looks like we need to update `required_signatures: false` too as signature in
github nomenclature means cryptograph
cederom commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2858241271
You are right @raiden00pl with this `strict: true` all PR needs to be
rebased each time master is updated that is a waste of focus and CI resources,
sorry, the nomenclature is a bit misle
cederom commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2858163302
> @raiden00pl: dependency on `Build` seems bad to me. With this change it
becomes impossible to merge changes where `nuttx` and `nuttx-apps` need to be
changed at the same time.
>
raiden00pl commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2857455486
dependency on `Build` seems bad to me. With this change it becomes
impossible to merge changes where `nuttx` and `nuttx-apps` need to be changed
at the same time.
Also `strict:
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
cederom commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2855940539
Okay I have asked #asfinfa on Slack, @Humbedooh said this looks okay, in
case we break anything it should be possible to unbreak :D
Switching to "ready for review" and turning on c
pussuw commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2854725871
So linear history means fast forward only. Yes, enforce that please. I
reading hate a git history that has a million divergent branches. Impossible to
follow.
--
This is an automated me
cederom commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2854665017
> @pussuw: What does linear history mean, no merge commits allowed ?
Good question :-) Admins help would be nice here :-P I think we DO WANT the
linear history as we do rebase PRs n
pussuw commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2854632952
What does linear history mean, no merge commits allowed ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
nuttxpr commented on PR #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324#issuecomment-2854570505
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
Yes, this PR likely meets the NuttX requirements, but n
cederom opened a new pull request, #16324:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16324
## Summary
* We do not have "Settings" tab in the Apache's owned repository, thus we
need to update `.asf.yaml` file with repository settings.
* No direct push to master branch is possible.
11 matches
Mail list logo
