xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
jasonbu commented on code in PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486#discussion_r2128795986
##
include/nuttx/spinlock.h:
##
@@ -499,6 +543,85 @@ irqstate_t spin_lock_irqsave(FAR volatile spinlock_t *lock)
# define spin_lock_irqsave(l) ((void)(l), up_irq_save
jasonbu commented on code in PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486#discussion_r2128789186
##
include/nuttx/spinlock.h:
##
@@ -532,6 +570,47 @@ irqstate_t spin_lock_irqsave_nopreempt(FAR volatile
spinlock_t *lock)
return flags;
}
+/
pussuw commented on code in PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486#discussion_r2128563069
##
include/nuttx/spinlock.h:
##
@@ -603,12 +603,17 @@ irqstate_t spin_lock_irqsave_nopreempt(FAR volatile
spinlock_t *lock)
static inline_function
irqstate_t rspin_lo
pussuw commented on code in PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486#discussion_r2128565957
##
include/nuttx/spinlock.h:
##
@@ -499,6 +543,85 @@ irqstate_t spin_lock_irqsave(FAR volatile spinlock_t *lock)
# define spin_lock_irqsave(l) ((void)(l), up_irq_save(
pussuw commented on code in PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486#discussion_r2128563069
##
include/nuttx/spinlock.h:
##
@@ -603,12 +603,17 @@ irqstate_t spin_lock_irqsave_nopreempt(FAR volatile
spinlock_t *lock)
static inline_function
irqstate_t rspin_lo
pussuw commented on code in PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486#discussion_r2128561699
##
include/nuttx/spinlock.h:
##
@@ -532,6 +570,47 @@ irqstate_t spin_lock_irqsave_nopreempt(FAR volatile
spinlock_t *lock)
return flags;
}
+/*
anchao commented on code in PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486#discussion_r2128541076
##
include/nuttx/spinlock.h:
##
@@ -585,11 +585,11 @@ irqstate_t spin_lock_irqsave_nopreempt(FAR volatile
spinlock_t *lock)
* Similar feature with enter_critical_se
jasonbu commented on PR #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486#issuecomment-2943095570
labeler fail should be the network issue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
jasonbu opened a new pull request, #16486:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16486
## Summary
As our previous discussion, we should use a new API
spin_lock_irqsave_nopreempt to handle the spin_lock with sched locked, and did
not change the default behavior of original spin_lock_i
10 matches
Mail list logo
