Re: [I] Add support to use NuttX as POSIX PSE51 system [nuttx]

2025-02-05 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #11390: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11390#issuecomment-2636565436 I think it should be nice to have support to original "minnsh" where almost everything were disabled, even signals, VFS, etc -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Ser

Re: [I] Add support to use NuttX as POSIX PSE51 system [nuttx]

2025-02-05 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on issue #11390: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11390#issuecomment-2636094858 But I think it's different thing, the user could unselect DISABLE_SIGNALS to keep the compliant at any time. We even have option to disable timer/pthread/mqueu(https://git

Re: [I] Add support to use NuttX as POSIX PSE51 system [nuttx]

2025-02-05 Thread via GitHub
raiden00pl commented on issue #11390: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11390#issuecomment-2636044972 it's useful to disable signals, but it's against POSIX, event PSE51 requires signals. Maybe if we could help the compiler optimize unused signal logic, but I don't know if that's

Re: [I] Add support to use NuttX as POSIX PSE51 system [nuttx]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
raiden00pl commented on issue #11390: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11390#issuecomment-2495393713 I'll deal with this issue sometime at the beginning of next year. Is there any discussion or justification for removing these options (DISABLE_SIGNALS etc) in the past ? I think I

Re: [I] Add support to use NuttX as POSIX PSE51 system [nuttx]

2024-11-22 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #11390: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11390#issuecomment-2494825735 @xiaoxiang781216 @raiden00pl I think we need to rollback that patches that disabled the ability to disable signals, to remove VFS support, etc. The PSE51 doesn't require it. Please s

Re: [I] Add support to use NuttX as POSIX PSE51 system [nuttx]

2024-07-13 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #11390: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11390#issuecomment-2226858741 The POSIX missing functions can be found here: https://medium.com/@zim.kalinowski/posix-support-comparison-in-various-rtoses-b45677889ec8 -- This is an automated message from th

Re: [I] Add support to use NuttX as POSIX PSE51 system [nuttx]

2023-12-14 Thread via GitHub
raiden00pl commented on issue #11390: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11390#issuecomment-1855487173 The ability to run NuttX on low cost chips would be a very cool feature, but if we're thinking about PSE51, then supporting the rest of POSIX RT profiles would be a good idea.

Re: [I] Add support to use NuttX as POSIX PSE51 system [nuttx]

2023-12-13 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on issue #11390: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11390#issuecomment-1855314061 it's a very interesting topic, we are looking to fully support PSE51 spec. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log