stbenn commented on issue #16202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16202#issuecomment-2807610128
I agree that changing all of the stm32 Kconfigs is probably not worth the
effort. The process of splitting them into submenus is relatively easy and
quick, but testing the refactor wo
raiden00pl commented on issue #16202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16202#issuecomment-2804036165
I'm against this as long as it's a change only for stm32h5. All stm32 ports
should look the same for easier maintenance. I don't think multiple Kconfig is
a bad idea, I think the
stbenn opened a new issue, #16202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16202
### Description
For arch configuration, is it acceptable to use separate Kconfig files for
logical blocks of the configuration? I am not proposing rework of already
implemented Kconfig files, but wou
