Re: [I] [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken [nuttx]

2025-07-07 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 closed issue #16555: [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16555 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [I] [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken [nuttx]

2025-07-06 Thread via GitHub
GUIDINGLI commented on issue #16555: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16555#issuecomment-3043390019 @michallenc Can you try this ? https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16682 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

Re: [I] [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken [nuttx]

2025-07-06 Thread via GitHub
michallenc commented on issue #16555: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16555#issuecomment-3042213150 @xiaoxiang781216 is @GUIDINGLI actively working on this? I would at least merge the `conn->lc_infile.f_inode == NULL` for now, to at least get datagrams working. Polling can be so

Re: [I] [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken [nuttx]

2025-06-23 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #16555: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16555#issuecomment-2996623435 @xiaoxiang781216 @wengzhe could you please comment here? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

Re: [I] [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken [nuttx]

2025-06-23 Thread via GitHub
michallenc commented on issue #16555: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16555#issuecomment-2996528799 Standard send/receive can be fixed by this. ```diff diff --git a/net/local/local_recvmsg.c b/net/local/local_recvmsg.c index 7f44907650..05baeaba48 100644 --- a/net/

Re: [I] [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken [nuttx]

2025-06-19 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on issue #16555: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16555#issuecomment-2989199439 @wengzhe please take a look. Do you think it is possible to add ```poll``` support to ```SOCK_DGRAM``` ? @GUIDINGLI since you created the PR https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pu

Re: [I] [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken [nuttx]

2025-06-19 Thread via GitHub
michallenc commented on issue #16555: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16555#issuecomment-2988420432 So it seems there are two problems. The first one is pretty obvious after looking to the code, we simply don't support `poll` on `SOCK_DGRAM` 😅 See https://github.com/apache/nuttx

[I] [BUG] Unix datagram sockets seems broken [nuttx]

2025-06-19 Thread via GitHub
michallenc opened a new issue, #16555: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16555 ### Description / Steps to reproduce the issue Unix local datagram sockets seems to be broken on NuttX. The following code doesn't work on `sim:udgram` configuration (nor other configurations with