SPRESENSE opened a new issue, #11239:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11239
When newlib, libmcs, or openlibm is selected as the math library,
the required public header files are not exported by `make export`.
* CONFIG_LIBM_NEWLIB
* CONFIG_LIBM_LIBMCS
* CONFIG_LIBM_OPE
casaroli commented on code in PR #11202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11202#discussion_r1400149513
##
arch/arm/src/Makefile:
##
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
#
-include $(TOPDIR)/Make.defs
+include
zhang-2019 opened a new pull request, #11238:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11238
VELAPLATFO-21376
Change-Id: I5d3a79045277fb7722371dfb3d4592eaee294aec
## Summary
## Impact
## Testing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
anjiahao1 commented on PR #11234:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11234#issuecomment-1820354282
```
000100024574 <_bzero>: /bzero [3/19]
100024574: d10083ff sub sp, sp, #32
100024578: a9017bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #16]
10002457c: f90007e0 str x0, [sp,
liqinhuixm opened a new pull request, #11237:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11237
## Summary
When setting the ESSID that contains the special characters (\"'), we need
to add an escape (\) for them.
## Impact
N/A
## Testing
If we want to connect the SSID that conta
SPRESENSE opened a new issue, #11236:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11236
This pull request https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11165 causes the task
to fail to delete.
There is a gnss sensor driver, which creates a task with `open()` and
deletes it with `close()`.
anjiahao1 commented on PR #11207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11207#issuecomment-1820319742
@xiaoxiang781216 @masayuki2009
[pull11234](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11234) fix macos crash
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
anjiahao1 opened a new pull request, #11234:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11234
## Summary
sim/macos:fix system bzero recursive call
## Impact
noting
## Testing
sim:nsh
There may be other functions where recursion occurs
--
This is an automated messag
eenurkka opened a new pull request, #11233:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11233
Version 1.3.1 is the latest tagged version as of November the 21st, 2023.
This patch prepares the required changes to make v1.3.1 work.
## Summary
Update OpenSBI
## Impact
GUIDINGLI commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1400051074
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
GUIDINGLI commented on PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#issuecomment-1820285832
And actually, there is another way to resolve this issue.
We can do more things at Step 8 sched_unlcok, re-pick the task from
ready-to-run list.
Then the CPU1 will execute the feed
GUIDINGLI commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1400051074
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
GUIDINGLI commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1400051074
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
GUIDINGLI commented on PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#issuecomment-1820221961
> @GUIDINGLI
>
> > The error is in step 6:
>
> Could you tell us how we can reproduce the error?
Compile cmd:
qemu-armv8a:nsh_smp
change CONFIG_SMP_NCPUS to 2
GUIDINGLI opened a new pull request, #2208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2208
## Summary
[Don't submit]: add test for SMP bug
## Impact
test only
## Testing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
anjiahao1 commented on PR #11207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11207#issuecomment-1820150262
@masayuki2009
```
(base) ➜ nuttx git:(master) ✗ sudo lldb nuttx
(lldb) target create "nuttx"
Current executable set to
'/Users/pengxianghao/Documents/code/nuttx_community/n
hujun260 opened a new pull request, #11232:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11232
## Summary
fix an integer overflow
## Impact
## Testing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use t
hujun260 opened a new pull request, #11231:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11231
## Summary
remove sched_[un]lock in xxx_waitsample
## Impact
## Testing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #11228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11228#discussion_r1399971713
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,648 @@
+/
+ * drivers/misc/optee.c
+ *
+ * Li
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx-website.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new 8c0976e8 Publishing web: 36ddd7c6
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399880424
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399880424
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399880424
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399880424
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399880424
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399759336
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399759336
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399759336
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399759336
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399759336
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#issuecomment-1819872293
What if multiple tasks running on different CPUs lock the scheduler? This
is the legacy behavior. Seems to me that there is a hole in the logic for this
case. We can't suspend the ta
alandeassis commented on issue #11223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11223#issuecomment-1819847221
@maxmbed can you ping NuttX from your host? You need ICMP enabled on NuttX!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399759336
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399759336
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on code in PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#discussion_r1399759336
##
sched/sched/sched_removereadytorun.c:
##
@@ -194,22 +194,15 @@ bool nxsched_remove_readytorun(FAR struct tcb_s *rtcb,
bool merge)
* next tcb in the assign
patacongo commented on PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#issuecomment-1819814269
I am a little confused. sched_removereadytorun() is part of the level
implementation of a context switch. High level checks such as if the scheduler
is locked should have already bee
hartmannathan commented on code in PR #11228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11228#discussion_r1399663567
##
drivers/misc/Kconfig:
##
@@ -32,6 +32,28 @@ config DEV_RPMSG_SERVER
default n
depends on RPTUN
+choice
+ prompt "Select optee dev imple
danielappiagyei-bc opened a new issue, #11230:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11230
Hi,
In a previous email thread, @xiaoxiang781216, @pkarashchenko, and I
discussed making C header files compatible with c++. This is necessary so a C++
application can `#include` C headers w/
pkarashchenko commented on code in PR #11228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11228#discussion_r1399560883
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,648 @@
+/
+ * drivers/misc/optee.c
+ *
+ * Lice
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #11202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11202#discussion_r1399557908
##
arch/arm/src/Makefile:
##
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
#
-include $(TOPDIR)/Make.defs
+
halyssonJr opened a new pull request, #11229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11229
## Summary
Adding support to qenconder and defining GPIOs to external RGB LED.
## Impact
None
## Testing

This does not seem to be caused by this patc
masayuki2009 commented on PR #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226#issuecomment-1819151404
@GUIDINGLI
>The error is in step 6:
Could you tell us how we can reproduce the error?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
davids5 commented on PR #2201:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2201#issuecomment-1819138950
Yokogawa 700937
> > Why not allocate these in a struct and reduce memory footprint that just
including that app costs?
>
> Could you please expand more with maybe a kind
hujun260 opened a new pull request, #11228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11228
The driver's main purpose is to support the porting of the open source
component optee_client (https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_client) to nttux.
The basic function of the driver module is to co
trns1997 opened a new issue, #11227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/11227
# Error
```
P:➜ nuttx git:(master) ✗ make -j8
LD: nuttx
arm-none-eabi-ld: warning: /home/trns1997/nuttxspace/nuttx/nuttx has a LOAD
segment with RWX permissions
arm-none-eabi-ld: /ho
casaroli opened a new pull request, #2207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2207
## Summary
It looks like this word is needed for this build to work with cmake
## Impact
Fixes cmake build when `libtest` is enabled
## Testing
--
This is an a
casaroli commented on PR #11202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11202#issuecomment-1819017850
It looks like cmake works and do not need this modification.
However, in `libtest` we are missing the word `PRIVATE` in `target_sources`.
I can do it in a separate PR
--
This is
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
pkarashchenko pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit e6ebcb62b1ec52f86c2c7950f95f12badf831ef2
Author: Xiang Xiao
AuthorDate: Sun Nov 19 23:24:46 2023 +0800
driver
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
pkarashchenko pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 11b3adf17fd4e252d880bd9f4dcab54e42e990fe
Author: Xiang Xiao
AuthorDate: Sun Nov 19 23:39:47 2023 +0800
driver
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
pkarashchenko pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
from 673cb18a7a drivers/mmcsd: mmcsd_sdinitialize should save csd register
into priv->csd
new e6ebcb62b1 driver
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
pkarashchenko pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 67bff06a24ffb82bfa711519b914d3ba3a706098
Author: Xiang Xiao
AuthorDate: Sun Nov 19 23:36:27 2023 +0800
driver
pkarashchenko merged PR #11222:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11222
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nutt
masayuki2009 commented on PR #11207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11207#issuecomment-1818937546
@anjiahao1
>What configuration is running? I am using sim:nsh.
I tried `sim:nsh` but the same crash also happened with `sim:smp`.
--
This is an automated mess
anjiahao1 commented on PR #11207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11207#issuecomment-1818902277
> @anjiahao1
>
> > @masayuki2009 i push newset patch,and test on qemu arm64 run ubuntu with
arm64 sim.
>
> It seems that the build error has been resolved. However, it cras
masayuki2009 commented on PR #11207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11207#issuecomment-1818897870
@anjiahao1
>@masayuki2009 i push newset patch,and test on qemu arm64 run ubuntu with
arm64 sim.
It seems that the build error has been resolved.
However, it crashed.
anjiahao1 commented on PR #11207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11207#issuecomment-1818883640
@masayuki2009 i push newset patch,and test on qemu arm64 run ubuntu with
arm64 sim.
```
ajh@arm64-mikasa:~/work/nuttx$ gdb-multiarch nuttx -ex "source
tools/gdb/__init__.py"
G
GUIDINGLI opened a new pull request, #11226:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11226
## Summary
sched: delete check when pick nexttcb in readytorun list
CPU0 CPU1
1. feed0 thread feed1 thread
(prio 1 affinity)(prio 1 a
60 matches
Mail list logo