Re: [PR] [#5528]Improvement[cli] Add and delete multiple tags at once in the Gravitino CLI [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
sunxiaojian commented on PR #5641: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5641#issuecomment-2495839227 > Thanks again for your work on this and adding the tests. I've added some feedback, and you seem to have missed some of the previous comments. @justinmclean I checked and the

Re: [PR] [#5528]Improvement[cli] Add and delete multiple tags at once in the Gravitino CLI [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
justinmclean commented on PR #5641: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5641#issuecomment-2495771345 Thanks again for your work on this and adding the tests - I've added some feedback, and you seem to have missed some of the previous comments. -- This is an automated message fr

Re: [I] [Bug report] Drop iceberg table column failed [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
FANNG1 commented on issue #1686: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/issues/1686#issuecomment-2495725245 For Hive catalog, you could only drop columns with compatibility types for the limitation of the Hive metastore, like drop column a from table with schema(a int, b int). For non-Hiv

[PR] [#5319] feat(core): add fileset pre event to Gravitino event [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
TungYuChiang opened a new pull request, #5652: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5652 ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? add fileset pre event to Gravitino event ### Why are the changes needed? Fix: #5548 ### Does this PR introduce _

Re: [PR] [#5550] feat(core): add partition pre event to Gravitino event [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
FANNG1 commented on PR #5590: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5590#issuecomment-2495496911 @LiuQhahah ,LGTM except minor comments, could you fix it ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the UR

Re: [PR] [#5550] feat(core): add partition pre event to Gravitino event [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
FANNG1 commented on code in PR #5590: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5590#discussion_r1855203020 ## core/src/test/java/org/apache/gravitino/listener/api/event/TestPartitionEvent.java: ## @@ -117,6 +117,14 @@ void testAddPartitionEvent() { checkPartitionInfo(p

Re: [PR] [#5437] feat(core): add schema event for Iceberg REST server [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
FANNG1 commented on code in PR #5651: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5651#discussion_r1855201198 ## iceberg/iceberg-rest-server/src/main/java/org/apache/gravitino/iceberg/service/dispatcher/IcebergNamespaceEventDispatcher.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ +/* + * Licens

Re: [PR] [#5550] feat(core): add partition pre event to Gravitino event [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
FANNG1 commented on code in PR #5590: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5590#discussion_r1855202743 ## core/src/test/java/org/apache/gravitino/listener/api/event/TestPartitionEvent.java: ## @@ -117,6 +117,14 @@ void testAddPartitionEvent() { checkPartitionInfo(p

Re: [PR] [#5626] feat (gvfs-fuse): Set up a submodule project for the Gvfs-fuse [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
FANNG1 commented on PR #5627: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5627#issuecomment-2495495742 > @FANNG1 can you please help to review again? If there's no blocking issue, I think we can improve the building command in the following PRs, what do you think? Seems there're so

Re: [PR] [#5437] feat(core): add schema event for Iceberg REST server [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
FANNG1 commented on code in PR #5651: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5651#discussion_r1855201198 ## iceberg/iceberg-rest-server/src/main/java/org/apache/gravitino/iceberg/service/dispatcher/IcebergNamespaceEventDispatcher.java: ## @@ -0,0 +1,238 @@ +/* + * Licens

Re: [PR] [#5437] feat(core): add schema event for Iceberg REST server [gravitino]

2024-11-23 Thread via GitHub
FANNG1 commented on PR #5651: URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/5651#issuecomment-2495492881 > 1. Should I use `OperationType.*_SCHEMA`, or should I create a new type called `OperationType.*_NAMESPACE`? I prefer to reuse `OperationType.*_SCHEMA`, because they are the s