Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-07-17 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 closed issue #9406: packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9406 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the sp

[I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-07-17 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 opened a new issue, #9406: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9406 ### Discussed in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9254 Originally posted by **dominar250** June 13, 2024 # ISSUE TYPE * Other # COMP

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-14 Thread via GitHub
DaanHoogland closed issue #9246: packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
DaanHoogland commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2167316852 sounds good @dominar250 , but still a separate ip range for the host and for the SVMs (and VMs in general) is best. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Serv

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2166298196 @weizhouapache Thanks for the suggestion. Is it a good idea to run management, KVM, and NFS on a single machine? Does this setup cause routing-related issues? My plan is to use

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2165987676 @DaanHoogland root@s-55-VM:~# ip a 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2165998754 oot@v-54-VM:~# ip a 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2166171881 @weizhouapache So cloudstack could'nt work with single ip range ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
weizhouapache commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2166161399 @dominar250 I think it is because your systemvm have two nics/ips in the same range typically the public and private should use different ip range and vlan/vni.

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2166009044 [system_vm-ip.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/15823200/system_vm-ip.txt) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2165973903 @DaanHoogland Thanks for addressing this issue. From SSVM/consoleproxy i can able to ping my kvm machine and management server which is stable . But I can't get constant ping f

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
weizhouapache commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2165983260 > @DaanHoogland Thanks for addressing this issue. From SSVM/consoleproxy i can able to ping my kvm machine and management server which is stable . But I can't get constant p

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
DaanHoogland commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2165592956 @dominar250 I cleanup the description a bit, please let me know if i messed it up. I do not understand your full scenario yet. you are pinging the console proxy but that does

Re: [I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246#issuecomment-2165331856 Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

[I] packet loss from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address [cloudstack]

2024-06-13 Thread via GitHub
dominar250 opened a new issue, #9246: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9246 # ISSUE TYPE * Other # COMPONENT NAME ~~~ ~~~ # CLOUDSTACK VERSION ~~~ ~~~ # CONFIGURATION #