Hi,
Richard, I also reply to your msg here to avoid too much redundancy.
Thanks for your efforts.
My project is based on what I believe is an official sample from Apple,
which Richard Charles posted as an attachment to his msg from 12/12/2017.
The sole purpose of my project is to learn how bindi
On Dec 20, 2017, at 01:23 , Eric Matecki wrote:
>
> The sole purpose of my project is to learn how bindings works, it has no
> practical application per se.
Bindings exist to support the use of NIB-based UI behavior. All bindings work
the same way, in the sense that they tie together the value
Thanks for your detailed comments!
Something I’ve realised through this is that you need to be really careful
about upgrading your system on a development machine. Going from 10.12 to 10.13
- and finding that pasteboard functions compile just fine but no longer work -
is almost as big a jump as
> On Dec 20, 2017, at 2:23 AM, Eric Matecki wrote:
>
> My project is based on what I believe is an official sample from Apple,
> which Richard Charles posted as an attachment to his msg from 12/12/2017.
It looks like you have taken your project from Malcolm Crawford's “Combatants”
sample code.
> On Dec 20, 2017, at 4:23 AM, Quincey Morris
> wrote:
>
>> The original code used all the same three array controllers, with the exact
>> same subclassing of the target's one.
>
> This is where I take the fifth.
>
> When bindings were introduced, back in 10.3 or 10.4, then refined in 10.5,
> On Dec 20, 2017, at 3:23 AM, Quincey Morris
> wrote:
>
> In effect, the whole thing with bindings died at 10.5, except for the part
> where they were used within IB to hook up specific controls to specific
> properties. That part is really all we use today.
It does seem like bindings died
Not for nothin', but I don’t think bindings have died. They are still supported
and used all over the OS. I use them all the time in my code too. They are
very useful. Bindings are built onto of KVO, which is a fundamental technology.
—Rob
> On Dec 20, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Richard Charles wro
On Dec 20, 2017, at 18:55 , Rob Petrovec wrote:
>
> Not for nothin', but I don’t think bindings have died.
So, let me respond jointly to all of the comments similar to this.
Of course bindings haven’t “died”, in the sense that no one *uses* them any
more. My point was that bindings, as a conce
