have a requirement to copy files from my Mac OS app. I find:
success=[NSWorkSpace performFileOperation:NSWorkSpaceCopyOperation
source:nsstring* // source directory path
destination:nsstring* // target directory path
file:nsarray* // nsstring array containing short paths of files or
directorie
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 2:36 AM, Aandi Inston wrote:
>
> My question relates to asynchronousness (is that a word)? It looks like a
> synchronous method as it returns a success or failure. But the documentation
> says of the tag variable "a positive integer if the operation was performed
> asynchron
That bug has gotten no response whatsoever from Apple. Any advice on how to
proceed?
> On Feb 4, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Jon Baumgartner
> wrote:
>
> I filed a radar: rdar://19716583
>
>
> On 1/29/2015 10:55 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>> Even in a sandbox, you can get the user’s home directory using
On Mar 5, 2015, at 11:30:01, Jon Baumgartner
wrote:
>
> That bug has gotten no response whatsoever from Apple. Any advice on how to
> proceed?
>
>> On Feb 4, 2015, at 1:19 PM, Jon Baumgartner
>> wrote:
>>
>> I filed a radar: rdar://19716583
You only filed it a month ago. It can take month
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Jon Baumgartner wrote:
> That bug has gotten no response whatsoever from Apple. Any advice on how
> to proceed?
Patience. :) Internal activity on a bug is rarely reflected to the
external developer, unless they need to verify the fix or provide
additional informa
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Jon Baumgartner
> wrote:
>
> That bug has gotten no response whatsoever from Apple. Any advice on how to
> proceed?
I wouldn’t expect a response from Apple in ‘only’ a month, except perhaps to
notify you that it’s a duplicate.
If they do fix the bug, you won’t
Hi,
I’m really confused as it what type of a Application I need to create, from
reading the "Daemons and Services Programming Guide", it lists:
Login Item.
XPC Service.
Launch Daemon.
Lauch Agent.
On the face of it, a LogIn Item seems to be what i am looking for, but its
unclear (at least to m
On 5 Mar 2015, at 19:29, Dave wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m really confused as it what type of a Application I need to create, from
> reading the "Daemons and Services Programming Guide", it lists:
>
> Login Item.
> XPC Service.
> Launch Daemon.
> Lauch Agent.
>
> On the face of it, a LogIn Item see
I'm converting a cell-based table to a view-based table in an old project. It
contains a pair of buttons, Big and Small, that set a value in user defaults to
13 or 11. The same value was used via bindings to set the Font Size in the
table. It worked fine with a cell-based table, but I'm having n
On Mar 5, 2015, at 15:20 , Shane Stanley wrote:
>
> The same value was used via bindings to set the Font Size in the table.
Er, what exactly was bound to what?
In the view-based version, the text field would typically be bound to
‘objectValue.something’ (or possibly just to ‘objectValue’ if yo
On 6 Mar 2015, at 10:32 am, Quincey Morris
wrote:
>
> Er, what exactly was bound to what?
In the cell-based table, the table's (sole) column's Font Size is bound to the
shared user defaults controller with a Controller Key of values and Model Key
Path of tableTextSize.
The buttons are in a r
On Mar 5, 2015, at 16:09 , Shane Stanley wrote:
>
> In the cell-based table, the table's (sole) column's Font Size is bound to
> the shared user defaults controller with a Controller Key of values and Model
> Key Path of tableTextSize.
>
> The buttons are in a radio group, with the Selected Ta
On 6 Mar 2015, at 11:42 am, Quincey Morris
wrote:
>
> Are you sure that the user defaults are being maintained properly? Does
> choosing from the radio buttons actually change the user defaults? Is the
> text field size getting set “manually” from somewhere else (perhaps as part
> of the stan
On Mar 5, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Shane Stanley wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 10:32 am, Quincey Morris
> wrote:
>>
>> Er, what exactly was bound to what?
>
> In the cell-based table, the table's (sole) column's Font Size is bound to
> the shared user defaults controller with a Controller Key of value
On Mar 5, 2015, at 17:06 , Ken Thomases wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, the solution is clumsy. You have to use a separate view NIB
> for the table cell view. That means you can't really design the view-based
> table in the NIB that contains the table view. The table view is in one NIB
> and the
On 6 Mar 2015, at 12:06 pm, Ken Thomases wrote:
>
> I _think_ connections to File's Owner are restored when the cell view NIB is
> loaded, but the File's Owner of the sub-NIB may not be the same as the File's
> Owner of the outer NIB. It may not even be the same class. It may also work
> to
On 6 Mar 2015, at 12:06 pm, Ken Thomases wrote:
>
> It seems you can't delete the cell view that's under the table column in the
> first NIB.
It also seems that the row height is based on its height.
--
Shane Stanley
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list
On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:15 PM, Shane Stanley wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 12:06 pm, Ken Thomases wrote:
>>
>> I _think_ connections to File's Owner are restored when the cell view NIB is
>> loaded, but the File's Owner of the sub-NIB may not be the same as the
>> File's Owner of the outer NIB. It
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 4:25 pm, Ken Thomases wrote:
>
>> So you're saying it's a bug?
>
> I think the bug is that IB hides the existence of the sub-NIB. If IB
> presented the sub-NIB with all of the usual placeholders and put a Shared
> User Defaults Controller into it when you set a binding on
On 6 Mar 2015, at 4:25 pm, Ken Thomases wrote:
>> So you're saying it's a bug?
>
> I think the bug is that IB hides the existence of the sub-NIB. If IB
> presented the sub-NIB with all of the usual placeholders and put a Shared
> User Defaults Controller into it when you set a binding on it,
20 matches
Mail list logo
