Kyle hi
On 15 Dec 2010, at 16:17, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>
> You're already using delegates for asynchronous operation. You
> therefore do not need the secondary thread.
>
> Asynchronous operation requires a running runloop. Your secondary
> thread doesn't have one running. The main thread has a runn
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:10 AM, julius wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm hoping you can help me with a question about threads and delegates.
> I don't have the terminology to pose the question suscinctly so I'll do so by
> reference to the program which gave rise to
Hello all,
I'm hoping you can help me with a question about threads and delegates.
I don't have the terminology to pose the question suscinctly so I'll do so by
reference to the program which gave rise to it.
I have an object which implements a number of delegate methods of
