On Apr 7, 2011, at 7:04 PM, Carter R. Harrison wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Nick Zitzmann wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 7, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Carter R. Harrison wrote:
>>
>>> I really appreciate all of your help. I gave your suggestion a shot and
>>> I've run into problems. Here's what ha
On Apr 7, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Nick Zitzmann wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Carter R. Harrison wrote:
>
>> I really appreciate all of your help. I gave your suggestion a shot and
>> I've run into problems. Here's what happens.
>>
>> 1. I create a new NSManagedObject in my main applicat
On Apr 7, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Carter R. Harrison wrote:
> I really appreciate all of your help. I gave your suggestion a shot and I've
> run into problems. Here's what happens.
>
> 1. I create a new NSManagedObject in my main application. It gets inserted
> into the context.
> 2. I save the c
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Nick Zitzmann wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Carter R. Harrison wrote:
>
2. What is the best way to implement it?
>>>
>>> Put your CoreData code into a framework shared by your applications. And
>>> use distributed notifications to keep the applica
On 2011 Mar 30, at 13:09, Nick Zitzmann wrote:
> Something like that. Or you can send a notification containing the IDs of the
> managed objects that were changed in the other app, and have your handler
> re-fault its managed objects if necessary so that it'll have the latest
> information whe
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Carter R. Harrison wrote:
>>> 2. What is the best way to implement it?
>>
>> Put your CoreData code into a framework shared by your applications. And use
>> distributed notifications to keep the applications in sync.
>
> So when one application saves the data sto
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Nick Zitzmann wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Carter R. Harrison wrote:
>
>> I'm working on a Mac Application that will have a helper application that is
>> always running in the background (even if the main application is not
>> currently running). Curre
On Mar 30, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Carter R. Harrison wrote:
> I'm working on a Mac Application that will have a helper application that is
> always running in the background (even if the main application is not
> currently running). Currently the main application uses Core Data to manage
> persist
I'm working on a Mac Application that will have a helper application that is
always running in the background (even if the main application is not currently
running). Currently the main application uses Core Data to manage persistent
objects. I'd like to setup the helper application to be able