Many have mentioned the technical things, but when it comes to your business
reasons, and you mentioned a point there, it might help to see why some of your
customers haven't upgraded and see about addressing that. They may be fine with
what they currently have, or they might see your update bei
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 2:00 PM, cocoa-dev-requ...@lists.apple.com wrote:
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:42:13 -0700
>> From: Jens Alfke
>> To: Appa Rao Mulpuri
>> Cc: "Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com"
>> Subject: Re: Tech update avo
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 1:00 PM, Rick Aurbach wrote:
>
> I may be missing something here
I think you are. This thread so far has been talking about Mac OS X, not iOS.
—Jens
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post ad
Aurbach
Aurbach & Associates, Inc.
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 2:00 PM, cocoa-dev-requ...@lists.apple.com wrote:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:42:13 -0700
> From: Jens Alfke
> To: Appa Rao Mulpuri
> Cc: "Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com"
> Subject: Re: Tech
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
>> On Aug 13, 2015, at 11:27 PM, Appa Rao Mulpuri
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the priority order. In GDC Vs ARC, GCD is the first one to opt
>> unless if you are app has more memory leaks. Correct me If I am wrong.
>
> ARC will simplify your so
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
> > On Aug 13, 2015, at 11:27 PM, Appa Rao Mulpuri
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the priority order. In GDC Vs ARC, GCD is the first one to opt
> > unless if you are app has more memory leaks. Correct me If I am wrong.
>
> ARC will simplify you
> On Aug 13, 2015, at 11:27 PM, Appa Rao Mulpuri
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the priority order. In GDC Vs ARC, GCD is the first one to opt
> unless if you are app has more memory leaks. Correct me If I am wrong.
ARC will simplify your source code, make new code easier to write, and make
memory i
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 03:01, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
> FYI, there’s a 3rd party library that patches in ARC weak-reference support
> for 10.6. (I don’t remember what it’s called or where it is, but I’m sure
> someone here does.)
PLWeakCompatibility by Plausible Labs?
https://github.com/plausiblel
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Jens Alfke wrote:
> Do you have a definite business need to keep supporting 10.5? I can’t believe
> you have many customers still running it — it came out in 2007 (the last
> release I worked on at Apple!)
>
> In terms of priorities, I think ARC is the biggest wi
We have limited people on 10.5, but revenue prospective we couldn¹t ignore
them.
Thanks for the priority order. In GDC Vs ARC, GCD is the first one to opt
unless if you are app has more memory leaks. Correct me If I am wrong.
Not sure, different code base will workout in this case. Implementation
Do you have a definite business need to keep supporting 10.5? I can’t believe
you have many customers still running it — it came out in 2007 (the last
release I worked on at Apple!)
In terms of priorities, I think ARC is the biggest win, followed by GCD. Some
people might rate auto-layout highe
Hi List,
My Mac application starts running from 10.5 onwards. We are planning to adopt
new technologies like GCD, Storyboards, ARC, Auto Layout and Swift. We have
benefits to start using like App performance improvements, reducing memory
leaks, reduce number of files and code size reduction...
12 matches
Mail list logo
