On Jun 23, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Sandeep Mohan Bhandarkar wrote:
>
>> I have just wired up the delegate outlet and for the second query. The count
>> shows up as zero but will this be the reason for the method not getting
>> called…?
>
> Yes. If
Yeah. checked it out by hardcoding a value of 2 in the rows returned now the
method seems to be getting called. Thank you for your assistance jens.
Regards,
Sandeep.
On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Sandeep Mohan Bhandarkar wrote:
>
>> I have just
On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Sandeep Mohan Bhandarkar wrote:
> I have just wired up the delegate outlet and for the second query. The count
> shows up as zero but will this be the reason for the method not getting
> called…?
Yes. If there aren’t any rows, the table view won’t need to ask for w
Hi Jens,
I have just wired up the delegate outlet and for the second query. The count
shows up as zero but will this be the reason for the method not getting
called...?
Regards,
Sandeep.
On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:34 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
> On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Sandeep Mohan Bhandarkar
Sandeep Mohan Bhandarkar wrote:
Have i missed anything else...??
All the protocol's methods are declared @optional. That means the
compiler won't check whether you've spelled your implementation's
method-name correctly. I have seen more than one case where it was
misspelled, despite an
On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Sandeep Mohan Bhandarkar wrote:
> 3) Did the delegate bindings for the Table
Do you mean that you set up Cocoa bindings? Generally if you use bindings to
the table columns, those are used instead of the data source. You wouldn’t want
to do both. (Or do you just mea
