On Jul 4, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
>
>> On Jul 4, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 20:21:39 -0700, Todd Heberlein said:
>>>
> Does putting an asterisk (*) in the Extensions field for your documen
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 14:54:54 -0500, Charles Srstka said:
>> Umm, why not just use the documented technique?
>
>Because that’s exactly what this is?
>
>http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/general/Reference/
>InfoPlistKeyReference/Articles/CoreFoundationKeys.html%23//apple_ref/doc/
On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 20:21:39 -0700, Todd Heberlein said:
>>
Does putting an asterisk (*) in the Extensions field for your document
>>> type not work in the sandbox?
>>>
>>> Excellent!
On Jul 4, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 20:21:39 -0700, Todd Heberlein said:
>
>>> Does putting an asterisk (*) in the Extensions field for your document
>> type not work in the sandbox?
>>
>> Excellent! Yes it did.
>
> Umm, why not just use the documented techniqu
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 20:21:39 -0700, Todd Heberlein said:
>> Does putting an asterisk (*) in the Extensions field for your document
>type not work in the sandbox?
>
>Excellent! Yes it did.
Umm, why not just use the documented technique?
setAllowedFileTypes: "A nil value indicates that all files s
On Jul 1, 2012, at 8:19 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
> Does putting an asterisk (*) in the Extensions field for your document type
> not work in the sandbox?
Excellent! Yes it did.
Thanks.
Todd
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Does putting an asterisk (*) in the Extensions field for your document type not
work in the sandbox?
Charles
On Jul 1, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Todd Heberlein wrote:
> I have an NSDocument subclass, and I want to open a data file that has no
> file extension. (It is BSM audit data, and there is no s
