Re: cpp class keywotd

2011-04-29 Thread koko
BJ - Great response, thanks for being a professional! -koko On Apr 28, 2011, at 10:24 PM, B.J. Buchalter wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:48 PM, koko wrote: > >> Well, apparently, compiling for iOS app versus iOS static lib treats the >> processing of the .pch diifferently. >> Moving some

Re: cpp class keywotd

2011-04-28 Thread B.J. Buchalter
On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:48 PM, koko wrote: > Well, apparently, compiling for iOS app versus iOS static lib treats the > processing of the .pch diifferently. > Moving some things out of .pch in the app build which are in the .pch of the > lib build solved my problem. > I would like to know more a

Re: cpp class keywotd

2011-04-28 Thread Quincey Morris
On Apr 28, 2011, at 20:49, koko wrote: > Well, apparently, compiling for iOS app versus iOS static lib treats the > processing of the .pch diifferently. > Moving some things out of .pch in the app build which are in the .pch of the > lib build solved my problem. > I would like to know more about

Re: cpp class keywotd

2011-04-28 Thread koko
Well, apparently, compiling for iOS app versus iOS static lib treats the processing of the .pch diifferently. Moving some things out of .pch in the app build which are in the .pch of the lib build solved my problem. I would like to know more about this if anyone can shed some light. -koko On