Re: completely messed up with bindings...

2009-01-15 Thread Keary Suska
On Jan 15, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Vitaly Ovchinnikov wrote: So, if my filter will have ten properties, I should observe them all? Is it possible to fake this somehow. Like define "self" property that depends of all my properties and them observe it? Or something like this... If all 10 properties

Re: completely messed up with bindings...

2009-01-15 Thread Vitaly Ovchinnikov
So, if my filter will have ten properties, I should observe them all? Is it possible to fake this somehow. Like define "self" property that depends of all my properties and them observe it? Or something like this... On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Keary Suska wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2009, at 1:02

Re: completely messed up with bindings...

2009-01-15 Thread Keary Suska
On Jan 15, 2009, at 1:02 AM, Vitaly Ovchinnikov wrote: One question was solved. I found a correct keypath to bind my document on selected filter. It works with "selection.self" keypath. But my -setFilter method still doesn't get called when I change it's properties. Maybe it is right, but I nee

Re: completely messed up with bindings...

2009-01-15 Thread Vitaly Ovchinnikov
One question was solved. I found a correct keypath to bind my document on selected filter. It works with "selection.self" keypath. But my -setFilter method still doesn't get called when I change it's properties. Maybe it is right, but I need to know when filter's properties were changed. Do I need