Re: Recursive blocks

2011-02-01 Thread Glen Low
Chris On 30/01/2011, at 2:26 AM, Chris Suter wrote: The use of a block here looks pretty ugly in my opinion. I don't see returning more than one type as being a big deal. Also, in the function case, I don't believe there's a need for the GKGraph * parameter; you can use self. Having said

Re: Recursive blocks

2011-01-29 Thread Chris Suter
Hi Glen, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Glen Low wrote: [snip] > The recursive block allows me to hide the recursion within a method, also to > avoid having to return more than 1 type (BOOL + GKGraph*) from the recursion > i.e. avoiding the ugly GKGraph** smallestCluster parameter. > > On the o

Re: Recursive blocks

2011-01-28 Thread Glen Low
Chris, Bill, All My mummy tells me not to feed the flames, but... On 28/01/2011, at 7:38 AM, Chris Suter wrote: Hi Bill, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Bill Bumgarner wrote: You have measured a situation where the pattern's marginal slowness actually matters? No, of course not; I don

Re: Recursive blocks

2011-01-27 Thread Chris Suter
Hi Bill, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Bill Bumgarner wrote: > You have measured a situation where the pattern's marginal slowness actually > matters? No, of course not; I don't have a real world use case for it and, I suspect, neither does anyone else. > A Block_copy() is going to often be