On Aug 20, 2012, at 2:19 AM, Mike Abdullah wrote:
> Have you considered handing off this portion of your code as part of an XPC
> process? It could then quit and relaunch without your app needing to be.
Yes, actually, but I figured a new open source framework would probably prove
more useful a
On 12 Aug 2012, at 19:53, Seth Willits wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
>>> I reported these assertions years ago but did get no response.
>>
>> Disclaimer: I wrote about ⅔ of the PubSub framework.
>> After I left Apple at the end of 2007 I don't think anyone else p
Am 12.08.2012 um 20:53 schrieb Seth Willits :
> The problem I'm having right now is if I add a feed, remove that feed, then
> add a new feed with the same URL, grabbing the entries throws assertions.
Hm. I don't seem to have this problem. I guess I'd need to make sure that the
old feed is act
On Aug 12, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Seth Willits wrote:
> I find it somewhat surprising that there are dozens of Mac and iOS feed
> readers out there, but no major open source Cocoa alternative to PubSub.
FWIW, the feed reader Vienna is open source:
http://www.vienna-rss.org/
It's not really framewo
On Aug 12, 2012, at 11:29 AM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>> I reported these assertions years ago but did get no response.
>
> Disclaimer: I wrote about ⅔ of the PubSub framework.
> After I left Apple at the end of 2007 I don't think anyone else put any work
> into the framework.
It really seems like t
On Aug 12, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Christian Kienle wrote:
> I reported these assertions years ago but did get no response.
Disclaimer: I wrote about ⅔ of the PubSub framework.
After I left Apple at the end of 2007 I don't think anyone else put any work
into the framework.
> If I had to do it again
I have worked with PubSub a lot as well but I also did stumble over these
assertions and I could also not work around them. The whole application I
developed had to be put on hold because of this. I reported these assertions
years ago but did get no response. If I had to do it again I would simp