On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Ken Thomases wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Totte Alm wrote:
>
>> I'm moving an older but large inhouse application from 10.6/32-bit/GC to
>> 10.9/64-bit/ARC.
>> It uses an internal auto update functionally where the app can store itself
>> into the databas
Can't you just use Sparkle to do app updates? It handles all of this for
you. Just a thought.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Totte Alm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm moving an older but large inhouse application from 10.6/32-bit/GC to
> 10.9/64-bit/ARC.
> It uses an internal auto update functionally
9 jan 2014 kl. 17:26 skrev Ken Thomases :
> On Jan 9, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Totte Alm wrote:
>
>> I'm moving an older but large inhouse application from 10.6/32-bit/GC to
>> 10.9/64-bit/ARC.
>> It uses an internal auto update functionally where the app can store itself
>> into the database when it
On Jan 9, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Totte Alm wrote:
> I'm moving an older but large inhouse application from 10.6/32-bit/GC to
> 10.9/64-bit/ARC.
> It uses an internal auto update functionally where the app can store itself
> into the database when it detects it is a new version, then the other users
9 jan 2014 kl. 14:52 skrev SevenBits :
> Can't you just use Sparkle to do app updates? It handles all of this for you.
> Just a thought.
It has more requirements and different once I think, webserver and update
feeds. The update is "downloaded" from a database using SQL, there is other
info t
