Sorry, I didn't mean irrational, I did in fact mean non-finite.
But you are right about the hopelessness of actually displaying so many digits.
As indicated, I don't in reality intend to do so.
Anyhow, as far as I'm concerned this issue is settled. I'm just using 100 now,
and will file a bug o
Le 25 nov. 2011 à 04:26, Conrad Shultz a écrit :
> On 11/24/11 3:20 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>> A formatter is used to convert an internal number representation
>> (integer, floating point, fixed point) into a string. Is has nothing
>> to do with the precision of the represented value.
>>
>>
On 11/24/11 3:20 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> A formatter is used to convert an internal number representation
> (integer, floating point, fixed point) into a string. Is has nothing
> to do with the precision of the represented value.
>
> If you use double to do your math, you will get as much p
Le 24 nov. 2011 à 23:46, Conrad Shultz a écrit :
> On 11/24/11 2:27 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>> Just a question. Why do you need a max frag digit greater than a couple of
>> tens ?
>
> I'm writing a custom formatter that will be used in the context of a
> scientific application and which w
On 11/24/11 2:27 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> Just a question. Why do you need a max frag digit greater than a couple of
> tens ?
I'm writing a custom formatter that will be used in the context of a
scientific application and which will take as input a potentially very
precise decimal. The fo
Le 24 nov. 2011 à 22:42, Conrad Shultz a écrit :
> Greetings,
>
> (Happy Thanksgiving, to those in countries which celebrate it.)
>
> I am experiencing a strange behavior with NSNumberFormatter. For
> reasons that aren't really relevant to the matter at hand, I wanted to
> create a formatter t
