On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Michael Watson wrote:
>
>>
>> If he means that the checkbox would never be toggleable under any
>> circumstances, and that it's purely to *indicate* state and not *control*
>> state, that's the wrong use for a che
On Sep 15, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Michael Watson wrote:
>
> If he means that the checkbox would never be toggleable under any
> circumstances, and that it's purely to *indicate* state and not *control*
> state, that's the wrong use for a checkbox button. A custom indicator that
> doesn't look like
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:45:27 -0700, Michael Watson said:
>If he means that the checkbox would never be toggleable under any
>circumstances, and that it's purely to *indicate* state and not
>*control* state, that's the wrong use for a checkbox button. A custom
>indicator that doesn't look like it c
On 15/9/10 7:11 PM, "jonat...@mugginsoft.com"
wrote:
>> Thanks. I guess it boils down to the fact that a checkbox is a bad choice
>> for just showing a binary state in a table.
> Checkbox sounds fine to me for this purpose.
>
> What about the NSTableColumn enabled binding?
Yes, that works. It j
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Keary Suska wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Shane Stanley wrote:
>
>> I have a table view using Cocoa bindings, and all columns have editable
>> turned off in the Attributes panel. However one column, which contains a
>> checkbox cell, steadfastly remains e
On 15 Sep, 2010, at 02:11, jonat...@mugginsoft.com wrote:
> On 15 Sep 2010, at 06:09, Shane Stanley wrote:
>
>> On 15/9/10 12:29 PM, "Keary Suska" wrote:
>>
>>> Checkboxes aren't edit controls, they are buttons, and to my knowledge don't
>>> even have an "editable" property (even though the tab
On 15 Sep 2010, at 06:09, Shane Stanley wrote:
> On 15/9/10 12:29 PM, "Keary Suska" wrote:
>
>> Checkboxes aren't edit controls, they are buttons, and to my knowledge don't
>> even have an "editable" property (even though the table column has such a
>> binding). To prevent changing a button stat
On 15/9/10 12:29 PM, "Keary Suska" wrote:
> Checkboxes aren't edit controls, they are buttons, and to my knowledge don't
> even have an "editable" property (even though the table column has such a
> binding). To prevent changing a button state (without significant subclassing)
> you must disable
On Sep 14, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Shane Stanley wrote:
> I have a table view using Cocoa bindings, and all columns have editable
> turned off in the Attributes panel. However one column, which contains a
> checkbox cell, steadfastly remains editable.
>
> I've also tried binding its editable property
