On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:07 AM, A.M. wrote:
> I am curious as to how you would propose to add error: handlers to DO calls
> considering that DO is meant to transparent and cannot modify method
> signatures. For example, assuming you were designing a new DO framework, how
> would you propose ch
On Mar 21, 2011, at 10:24 PM, Chris Hanson wrote:
> Ultimately, the solution will be to modify HessianKit -- or any other
> framework that presents an RPC-style interface[1] -- to follow the Cocoa
> convention of returning BOOL (or a non-nil/nil object reference) to indicate
> success or failu
On Mar 21, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Chris Hanson wrote:
> The reason is that if your exception crosses any stack frame you don’t fully
> control, all bets are off when it comes to the state of your program. The
> frameworks have all been written with the assumption that exceptions are only
> for cat
