On 9/23/09 1:14 PM, Eric Gorr said:
>> It seems to me that this isn't Cocoa-related, so it's really off-
>> topic...
>
>Sadly, there doesn't appear to be a good mailing list for these
>topics.
Launch Service's lineage is Carbon (to use a overloaded term). It uses
FSRefs and OSStatus and other Cl
Oh. Well…
There isn’t an Apple mailing list for it. Perhaps the developer forums
(deveforums.apple.com) might have an area appropriate if you have
access).
But mostly you’d need to rely on the doc, providing feedback, and
perhaps something like StackOverflow or the like.
Not as straight
Just so there is no mistake.
Discussion of the removal of creator codes, merit of creator codes,
etc, isn’t appropriate for here.
I don’t have a suggestion for a better location for you to discuss it.
Scott
[moderator]
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann wrote:
It has been al
Actually, I was more interested in learning where questions about UTIs
would go (it's not clearly a Cocoa topic), not where advocation of UTI
over any other file association system would go.
On Sep 23, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Scott Anguish wrote:
This might be a repeat - I can’t mail from my regul
This might be a repeat - I can’t mail from my regular address from
where I am currently.
This is not the appropriate list for advocation of UTI over any other
file association system.
I’m not aware of any that would be appropriate.
So please take it elsewhere. The comments on that article,
On Sep 23, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Alastair Houghton wrote:
On 23 Sep 2009, at 17:42, Todd Heberlein wrote:
As a result, most of their conclusions are incorrect as well. If
you can't set the UTI differently on two files with the same type
code and extension, it can't serve as a creator code.
On 23 Sep 2009, at 17:42, Todd Heberlein wrote:
As a result, most of their conclusions are incorrect as well. If
you can't set the UTI differently on two files with the same type
code and extension, it can't serve as a creator code.
I've been wondering about this. Daring Fireball carried s
On Sep 23, 2009, at 12:37 PM, BJ Homer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Todd Heberlein >wrote:
Inside Snow Leopard's UTI: Apple fixes the Creator Code
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09/22/inside_snow_leopards_uti_apple_fixes_the_creator_code.html
Some may also find it misl
As a result, most of their conclusions are incorrect as well. If
you can't set the UTI differently on two files with the same type
code and extension, it can't serve as a creator code.
I've been wondering about this. Daring Fireball carried some links
with some strong criticisms on this, a
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Todd Heberlein wrote:
> Some may find the following Apple Insider article on the the topic useful:
>
> Inside Snow Leopard's UTI: Apple fixes the Creator Code
>
> http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09/22/inside_snow_leopards_uti_apple_fixes_the_creator_code.h
Some may find the following Apple Insider article on the the topic
useful:
Inside Snow Leopard's UTI: Apple fixes the Creator Code
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09/22/inside_snow_leopards_uti_apple_fixes_the_creator_code.html
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Jens Alfke wrote:
On Sep 23
On Sep 23, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann wrote:
So I looked at Launch Services Reference, but could not figure out,
how to inform Lauch Services which app to use for some document.
But if Finder can tell Lauch Services, then my app should be also
able to do this, shouldn't it?
Where
12 matches
Mail list logo
