Re: Core Data Bindings. weird behavior.

2008-08-13 Thread Sandro Noel
Quincey Again thank you! I did just that, 12 seconds before receiving your mail, so i'm glad i'm not totaly lost:) but the value still get's changed wrong, instead of changing the relationship object it changes the display name of that object. transactionType.name I've tried to have the co

Re: Core Data Bindings. weird behavior.

2008-08-13 Thread Quincey Morris
On Aug 13, 2008, at 15:19, Sandro Noel wrote: the colums is bound with Value, transaction.transactiontype.name the combo box is content bound to a array controller that manages the items i want to choose from in the combo box. as content values (transactionTypes) name. Try this: Set the

Re: Core Data Bindings. weird behavior.

2008-08-13 Thread Sandro Noel
ha! what i found out is that since i'm using the transactionType.name to display the value of the relationship instead of updating the relationship to that row, the bindings update the name of the transactionType item in the database, so all the rows using that use that item also get rename

Re: Core Data Bindings. weird behavior.

2008-08-13 Thread Sandro Noel
Quincey, thank you the colums is bound with Value, transaction.transactiontype.name the combo box is content bound to a array controller that manages the items i want to choose from in the combo box. as content values (transactionTypes) name. I did not know about the content binding. how s

Re: Core Data Bindings. weird behavior.

2008-08-13 Thread Quincey Morris
On Aug 12, 2008, at 20:10, Sandro Noel wrote: I have these entities, with these attributes and relationships. entity: Transactions attributes: field1, field2 relationship : transactionType entity: TransactionTypes attributes: field1, field2 relationship : transaction In interface builder I ha

Re: Core Data Bindings. weird behavior.

2008-08-13 Thread Sandro Noel
Chris Thank you for your time. I'm sorry for the entity names, force of habit anything that holds more than one record is plural to me. I'll correct them when all the problems are weeded out, I don't want to add to my current troubles. My model is EXACTLY the same as what you described.