While on this subject I just got the dreaded: Your app will now spend the next
6-12 months in review round file hell before being rejected without further
review:
"We are currently reviewing an app that you submitted for inclusion on the App
Store, and want to let you know that the review proce
On Nov 14, 2011, at 5:32 PM, Conrad Shultz wrote:
> On 11/11/11 9:50 PM, April wrote:
>> Actually I had a long existing project that I start working on in 4.1
>> before the release and then 4.2 when I started icloud support up
>> until now. I've hit multiple delays and setbacks due to adding
>> f
On 11/11/11 9:50 PM, April wrote:
> Actually I had a long existing project that I start working on in 4.1
> before the release and then 4.2 when I started icloud support up
> until now. I've hit multiple delays and setbacks due to adding
> features out of fear of 1 star ratings due to "It's useless
On 11/11/11 9:37 PM, Glenn L. Austin wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Conrad Shultz wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/11 1:21 PM, Glenn L. Austin wrote:
>>> Set your iOS Deployment Target to iOS 4.3 and build ARMv7.
>>
>> I don't think the OP said that the app should be version
>> restricted. Why target
On Nov 11, 2011, at 16:59 , April wrote:
> That's why the meaningless name in my email even though by and large I do not
> use a pseudonym anywhere else in the world.
AFAIK, there is not and never has been any standard of etiquette for this list
that forbids or even frowns upon the use of pseud
On Nov 11, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Conrad Shultz wrote:
> On 11/11/11 4:59 PM, April wrote:
>> Years ago I used my real name. I was very new to cocoa (this is like
>> 2002) and asked some dumb questions. I got flamed to death.
>
> Greetings, April. I regret that you were mistreated in the past; I am
On Nov 11, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Conrad Shultz wrote:
> On 11/11/11 1:21 PM, Glenn L. Austin wrote:
>> Set your iOS Deployment Target to iOS 4.3 and build ARMv7.
>
> I don't think the OP said that the app should be version restricted.
> Why target 4.3?
4.3 only runs on ARMv7, so it's one way to limi
On 11/11/11 4:59 PM, April wrote:
> Years ago I used my real name. I was very new to cocoa (this is like
> 2002) and asked some dumb questions. I got flamed to death.
Greetings, April. I regret that you were mistreated in the past; I am
confident that will not occur now.
Anyhow, did you get a c
Hmm
It's difficult to argue with numbers like this, and of course I am guessing
that a noticeable divot in sales really isn't there unless I actually do write
the next angry birds... Of course based on their ratio, I'll have to write
another 23 applications before I have a hit of that magni
Years ago I used my real name. I was very new to cocoa (this is like 2002) and
asked some dumb questions. I got flamed to death. I began using a man's name
shortly there after and dumb questions did not receive even remotely the same
hostility. (Admittedly some though) I started using that fake
On 11/11/11 2:02 PM, Development wrote:
> Well your average dolt that jailbreaks and knows absolutely nothing
> about it would be blockaded. It's the folks that have hex editors and
> the time to figure it out that will find it easy. Which is still a
> little too much for many JB'ers. Besides, I wa
See comments below.
(Sent from my iPhone.)
--
Conrad Shultz
On Nov 11, 2011, at 13:39, Development wrote:
> That's the problem I ran in to. I wanted to maintain some degree of backward
> compatibility 4.2
OK. But architecture and target SDK can be throttled independently. So set your
Well your average dolt that jailbreaks and knows absolutely nothing about it
would be blockaded. It's the folks that have hex editors and the time to figure
it out that will find it easy. Which is still a little too much for many JB'ers.
Besides, I want to see it broken so I can figure out how to
That's the problem I ran in to. I wanted to maintain some degree of backward
compatibility 4.2
However... honestly... I dont have anything pre ipod 3 iphone 3gs to even test
on so I can't say with any accuracy the software will work anyway.
I guess switching to 4.3 minimum is fine. I mean
On 11/11/11 1:21 PM, Glenn L. Austin wrote:
> Set your iOS Deployment Target to iOS 4.3 and build ARMv7.
I don't think the OP said that the app should be version restricted.
Why target 4.3?
--
Conrad Shultz
Synthetiq Solutions
www.synthetiqsolutions.com
___
On 11/11/11 1:11 PM, Development wrote:
> Well like I said in my previous email. I need to know how to build my
> app to run as an iPhone app on iPhone and a iPad app on iPad. Since I
> always use device specifics in the interface.
>
> In the setting in the Build Summary I've set it to Universal.
On Nov 11, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Development wrote:
> Well like I said in my previous email. I need to know how to build my app to
> run as an iPhone app on iPhone and a iPad app on iPad. Since I always use
> device specifics in the interface.
>
> In the setting in the Build Summary I've set it to
Universal doesn't mean armv6 and armv7 in this case: it means you have a
dedicated iPad interface too. If you don't, don't set it to universal. There
are no armv6 iPads, although I don't see why you wouldn't be able to submit an
app that contains both architectures.
Have you tested your build o
Well like I said in my previous email. I need to know how to build my app to
run as an iPhone app on iPhone and a iPad app on iPad. Since I always use
device specifics in the interface.
In the setting in the Build Summary I've set it to Universal. in the Build
Settings the arch is set to the on
Quick note: the 3GS and onward use ARMv7. You would not be limited to the 4S.
(Sent from my iPhone.)
--
Conrad Shultz
On Nov 11, 2011, at 12:42, Development wrote:
> I attempted to submit an app last night and it failed validation because it's
> universal but did not include armv6 arch. I'm
ok... since I'm apparently stupid... Why, if I set my build setting in the
summary to universal am I rejected? do I need to change this to iPhone? And
when I do of course I loose iPad specifics as well as the full screen
interface I guess I don't understand what I'm supposed to do now.
On
On Nov 11, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Development wrote:
> Problem. an upcoming game i'm working on requires a certain library I
> purchased and of course do not have code level access too. It was not
> compiled correctly for me to use the universal setting in xcode. it's armv7
> only. Hence I cannot su
I forgot to ask question two
The second is that I want to prevent my iOS apps from running on jailbroken
devices. Doing this is easy, albeit easily circumvented too, however is it
"Legal" to do this?
On Nov 11, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Development wrote:
> I attempted to submit an app last nig
I forgot to ask question two
The second is that I want to prevent my iOS apps from running on jailbroken
devices. Doing this is easy, albeit easily circumvented too, however is it
"Legal" to do this?
On Nov 11, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Development wrote:
> I attempted to submit an app last night
24 matches
Mail list logo
