On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:45:13 -0400, John Engelhart
> said:
>
> >There are an awful lot of "Top 10" applications that use RegexKitLite
> >that don't acknowledge their use
>
> "An awful lot"? Ex hypothesi and by definition, there must be 10 su
On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Matt Neuburg wrote:
>> There are an awful lot of "Top 10" applications that use RegexKitLite
>> that don't acknowledge their use
>
> "An awful lot"? Ex hypothesi and by definition, there must be 10 such
> applications or fewer...! m.
Except that there can be many Top
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:45:13 -0400, John Engelhart
said:
>There are an awful lot of "Top 10" applications that use RegexKitLite
>that don't acknowledge their use
"An awful lot"? Ex hypothesi and by definition, there must be 10 such
applications or fewer...! m.
--
matt neuburg, phd = m...@tidbi
--As of March 23, 2008 1:16:47 PM -0400, John Engelhart is alleged to have
said:
I've just released what I'm calling 'RegexKitLite'. It targets a
different group of people than the full fledged RegexKit
(http://regexkit.sourceforge.net/).
--As for the rest, it is mine.
Nice. Though I'd rat
On 23 Mar '08, at 10:16 AM, John Engelhart wrote:
I put RegexKitLite together after helping some users with some
RegexKit problems, specifically word breaking Thai. After putting
together a quick and dirty wrapper around the ICU regex engine, I
realized I had most of the pieces for a ligh
