Re: Question about the Main Thread

2017-04-25 Thread Charles Srstka
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Charles Srstka wrote: > >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Dave wrote: >> >> Mac Project. >> >> Hi All, >> >> I’m using performSelector: withObject: afterDelay: in order to postpone >> further processing until after the current method/run loop as expired, this >

Re: Question about the Main Thread

2017-04-25 Thread Charles Srstka
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Dave wrote: > > Mac Project. > > Hi All, > > I’m using performSelector: withObject: afterDelay: in order to postpone > further processing until after the current method/run loop as expired, this > puts the request at the End of the Queue, my question is, is the

Re: Question about the Main Thread

2017-04-25 Thread David Duncan
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 7:51 AM, Dave wrote: > > Mac Project. > > Hi All, > > I’m using performSelector: withObject: afterDelay: in order to postpone > further processing until after the current method/run loop as expired, this > puts the request at the End of the Queue, my question is, is th

Question about the Main Thread

2017-04-25 Thread Dave
Mac Project. Hi All, I’m using performSelector: withObject: afterDelay: in order to postpone further processing until after the current method/run loop as expired, this puts the request at the End of the Queue, my question is, is there anyway of putting it at the head of the Queue so it gets